2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To insure or not to insure? Analysis of foresters' willingness-to-pay for fire and storm insurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, continued increase in the subsidy ratio will only lead to financial pressure. These findings are consistent with the researches of Sauter [35] and Ma [36]. The management enlightenment is that in order to solve the problem of insufficient supply and demand in the current forest insurance industry, we should consider the differentiated premium subsidy policy and the multilevel subsidy system.…”
Section: Impact Of the Probability Of Deforestation Occurrencesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, continued increase in the subsidy ratio will only lead to financial pressure. These findings are consistent with the researches of Sauter [35] and Ma [36]. The management enlightenment is that in order to solve the problem of insufficient supply and demand in the current forest insurance industry, we should consider the differentiated premium subsidy policy and the multilevel subsidy system.…”
Section: Impact Of the Probability Of Deforestation Occurrencesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There are few studies on indirect subsidies (subsidies for insurance companies). These researchers emphasized that to stimulate insurance companies to innovate forest insurance products and increase insurance supply, the government should take measures such as subsidizing the insurance company's business expenses and giving it certain tax preferences [34][35][36]. Overall, the current papers on how to improve the efficiency of direct subsidies (subsidies to forestry enterprises) are still based on qualitative discussion, which inevitably can be driven either by the personal subjectivity of researchers or by organized interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers have studied the relationship between WTP and specific influencing factors. Those possible influencing factors include but are not limited to governmental aid (Pynn and Ljung, 1999;Wang et al, 2009;Athavale and Avila, 2011;Botzen and Van Den Bergh, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Tian et al, 2014;Tian and Yao, 2015;Kuo, 2016;Sauter et al, 2016), gender (Kung and Chen, 2012;Yoko, 2014), age and educational background (Tian et al, 2014;Abbas et al, 2015), income (Athavale and Avila, 2011;Abbas et al, 2015;Tian and Yao, 2015), location (Wang et al, 2012), structure type (Tian et al, 2014;Tian and Yao, 2015), previous disaster experience (Seifert et al, 2013;Oral et al, 2015), risk perception (Kunreuther, 1976;Seifert et al, 2013), insurance experience (Kung and Chen, 2012;Tian et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2012;Abbas et al, 2015) and so on. As noted, factors specifically related to EMC were not accentuated in previous studies, as well as self-prevention behaviors and also a broader range of sociodemographic characteristics, including family size, family labors, agricultural labors and out-migrating labors, which are famers move to other places to work.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a non-risk-neutral decision maker would require the calculation of a safety equivalent, which would go beyond the scope of this study. Recent studies conclude that decision makers in private forestry are rather risk-averse (Brunette et al 2014;Mußhoff and Maart-Noelck 2014;Sauter et al 2016), while others conclude that forest owners are predominately risk-loving or risk-neutral (Andersson and Gong 2010). To cover these findings it would be interesting to include risk attitude in the FPOT.…”
Section: Meaning Of El For Management Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%