Toddlers’ impulsivity, inhibitory control, and maternal eating-related supervision in relation to toddler body mass index: Direct and interactive effects

Lelakowska, Gabriela; Kanya, Meghan J.; Balassone, Brittany R.; Savoree, Shelby L.; Boddy, Lauren E.; Power, Thomas G.; Bridgett, David J.

doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104343

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 99 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tables 1 and 2 show the characteristics of 18 included studies 38–55 . The median (interquartile ranges) of mean age at baseline, percent of male participants, and follow‐up duration were 4.75 (4–7.75) years, 49.1% (46.7%–51%), and 5.25 (3–7.75) years, respectively.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Tables 1 and 2 show the characteristics of 18 included studies. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] The median (interquartile ranges) of mean age at baseline, percent of male participants, and follow-up duration were 4.75 (4-7.75) years, 49.1% (46.7%-51%), and 5.25 (3-7.75) years, respectively. We categorized the included studies into two groups as follows: (i) the studies of EF for predicting weight status (see Table 1) and (ii) the studies of weight status for predicting EF (see Table 2).…”

Section: Studies Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bidirectional prediction between weight status and executive function in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary This study examined the predictability of child weight status on executive function (EF) and vice versa. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and EMBASE for longitudinal studies conducted in children and adolescents on October 31, 2021. A pairwise meta‐analysis was performed using a frequentist random‐effects approach. The quality of all included studies was evaluated using Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and GRADE assessments. This study included 18 longitudinal studies (N = 30,101). Overall executive functioning was a significant negative predictor of child weight status (pooled beta coefficient = −0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.22 to −0.07]; I2 = 97%). The pooled odds ratio also revealed that high EF children had a significant lower risk for developing overweight/obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72; 95% CI [0.59 to 0.87]; I2 = 72%). Conversely, child weight status was a significant negative predictor of overall executive functioning (pooled beta coefficient = −0.06; 95% CI [−0.12 to −0.01]; I2 = 81%). These results suggest a bidirectional prediction between child weight status and EF. These predictabilities are low but potentially beneficial for implementation in childcare systems.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studies Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bidirectional prediction between weight status and executive function in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…sample, Lelakowska et al [72] found that performance on the snack delay task at 24 months was not related to either parent-reported emotional overeating or child BMI at 30 months.…”

Section: Key Concepts and Processes In Appetite Self-regulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, the model involves recursive top-down and bottom-up processes in the regulation of action, emotion and delay of gratification. Top-down and bottom-up processes can be differentiated conceptually, but also at the level of neurobiology [72]. Top down processes have been described as "reflecting more effortful/executive control process served by cortical structures in the anterior cingulate cortex" ([71] p. 603).…”

Section: Key Concepts and Processes In General Self-regulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The idea of bottom-up and top-down processes and their interplay intrinsic in approaches to GSR has been part of recent conceptualizations of ASR [32,39,44,61,72,101]. While in the case of ASR, the self-regulatory processes include top-down, cognitive and decision-making processes, regulation is also dependent on body and brain responses (such as hormonal and brain signals about satiation) to the food, processes such as alliesthesia and interactions between metabolic, reward, and cognitive processes [125].…”

Section: Key Concepts and Processes In Appetite Self-regulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

“Food” and “non-food” self-regulation in childhood: a review and reciprocal analysis

Russell

2020

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In developmental science, there is an extensive literature on non-food related self-regulation in childhood, where several domains relating to emotions, actions and cognitions have been identified. There is now growing attention to food related self-regulation in childhood, especially difficulties with ASR, and the consequences for weight gain and adiposity. The aim of this narrative review was to conduct a reciprocal analysis of self-regulation in the food and non-food domains in childhood (referred to as appetite self-regulation (ASR) and general self-regulation (GSR) respectively). The focus was on commonalities and differences in key concepts and underpinning processes. Methods Databases and major journals were searched using terms such as self-regulation, appetite self-regulation, or self-regulation of energy intake, together with associated constructs (e.g., Executive Function, Effortful Control, delay-of-gratification). This was followed by backward and forward snowballing. Results and discussion The scholarship on GSR in childhood has had a focus on the role of the cognitively-oriented Executive Function (EF), the temperamentally-based Effortful Control (EC) and the recursive interplay between bottom-up (reactive, emotion driven, approach or avoidance) and top-down (cognitive, conscious decision-making) processes. “Hot” and “cool/cold” EF and self-regulation situations have been distinguished. There were some parallels between GSR and ASR in these areas, but uncertainty about the contribution of EF and EC to ASR in young children. Possible differences between the contribution to ASR-related outcomes of delay-of-gratification in food and non-food tasks were apparent. Unique elements of ASR were identified; associated with psychological, biological and neurological responses to food and bottom-up processes. A diverse number of situations or elements connected to ASR exist: for example, energy balance homeostasis, caloric compensation, hunger regulation, satiation, satiety, energy density of food, eating in the absence of hunger, emotional eating, etc. Conclusions Self-regulation in food and non-food domains are amenable to a reciprocal analysis. We argue that self-regulation of appetite should be added as a domain under the umbrella of self-regulation in childhood along with the other non-food related domains. This could lead to a broader understanding of self-regulation in childhood, and generate novel lines of enquiry.

show abstract

Parent-Child influences on child eating self-regulation and weight in early childhood: A systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Toddlers’ impulsivity, inhibitory control, and maternal eating-related supervision in relation to toddler body mass index: Direct and interactive effects

Cited by 9 publications

References 99 publications

Bidirectional prediction between weight status and executive function in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies

Bidirectional prediction between weight status and executive function in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies

“Food” and “non-food” self-regulation in childhood: a review and reciprocal analysis

Parent-Child influences on child eating self-regulation and weight in early childhood: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About