Too Hard, Too Easy, Or Just Right? The Effects of Context on Effort and Boredom Aversion

Abstract

Despite people’s general desire to avoid cognitive effort there is a limit to our parsimony: boredom, a state defined by a lack of mental engagement, is found similarly aversive. The work presented here investigates how context—the alternative tasks present and the environmental context—impacts people’s aversion to exerting cognitive effort and avoiding boredom via a demand-selection task. In a population of undergraduate students, we assessed how people’s willingness to exert mental effort (in a working memory task) is affected by the presence of an easier alternative (less cognitively demanding) or a boring alternative (doing nothing at all). To manipulate environmental context, we conducted the experiment both online, where participants complete the task remotely, and in a controlled laboratory setting. We find people willingly seek out effortful tasks to avoid boredom, despite avoiding high demands when both tasks on offer required some effort. We also find large effects of the participants’ environmental context, with preferences for the most demanding task increasing by over 150% in the lab compared to online. These results bear relevance to theories which argue the costs of effort are determined relative to the alternatives available (e.g., opportunity cost theories). Moreover, the results demonstrate that researchers who deliberately (or inadvertently) manipulate effort and boredom must consider the effects context (both choice and environmental) has on people’s behaviour.