2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools to measure the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: What do we have in the platter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our online survey consisted of a sociodemographic assessment (i.e., age, gender, and year of education), the COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI), and the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) questionnaires. There are several tools to measure the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic [ 37 ]. We chose the CPDI scale because it has been a pioneering instrument for measuring psychological distress among general populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our online survey consisted of a sociodemographic assessment (i.e., age, gender, and year of education), the COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI), and the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) questionnaires. There are several tools to measure the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic [ 37 ]. We chose the CPDI scale because it has been a pioneering instrument for measuring psychological distress among general populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, older adults were more hesitant, as greater age is associated with a higher prevalence of underlying risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease and increased mortality (Ioannidis et al, 2020;Parlapani et al, 2020aParlapani et al, , 2020b. This new tool could add to the COVID-19 research field as it is crucial to develop structured and validated instruments to address the psychosocial impact of the pandemic and to contribute to the assessment and management of hesitant citizens (Cortez et al, 2020;Das et al, 2020). Any identified concerns need more in-depth understanding of the nature of hesitancy as well as of the personality traits of those who are hesitating (Larson et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This new tool could add to the COVID-19 research field as it is crucial to develop structured and validated instruments to address the psychosocial impact of the pandemic and to contribute to the assessment and management of hesitant citizens (Cortez et al, 2020 ; Das et al, 2020 ). Any identified concerns need more in-depth understanding of the nature of hesitancy as well as of the personality traits of those who are hesitating (Larson et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, a more in-depth assessment of patients' perceptions of the risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic is recommended. While no specific questionnaires were available at the time of this preliminary study, the progressive introduction of validated scales and questionnaires (e.g., Cortez et al, 2020 ) will allow a more detailed evaluation of the cognitive and psychological factors related to the interpretation of the COVID-19 emergency. In conclusion, in this study we provided preliminary evidence in PD of a possible effect of social cognition dysfunctions in interpreting the COVID-19 emergency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%