2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2022)079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-pair production at the LHC with MINNLOPS

Abstract: We consider the production of a pair of heavy quarks and illustrate the derivation of the MiNNLOPS method to match next-to-next-to-leading order calculations with parton showers (NNLO+PS) for this class of processes. As a first application, we construct an event generator for the fully differential simulation of hadronic top-quark pair production at NNLO+PS and discuss all details of its implementation in a parton shower Monte Carlo framework. We present new phenomenological results for the Large Hadron Collid… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2.31)), as discussed for instance in ref. [73], as well as for the scales used in the non-singular contribution (last term in the same equation).…”
Section: Comparison With Atlas Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2.31)), as discussed for instance in ref. [73], as well as for the scales used in the non-singular contribution (last term in the same equation).…”
Section: Comparison With Atlas Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, results for top-pair production at NNLO+PS were also published in ref. [72,73]. As far as diphoton production is concerned, the only NNLO+PS accurate results have been obtained with the Geneva method in ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard scale in the logarithm is consistently changed to m V H /2 as explained in ref. [144]. At small transverse momenta, we use the standard MiNNLO PS scale setting given in eq.…”
Section: Jhep07(2022)008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the signature pp → + − E T features a large multi-boson and top quark background, and will be difficult to observe. However, considering the extent to which SM simulations at NNLO+LL(PS) can describe data [111][112][113][114], the presumable mass difference between SM and Zee-Babu particles [28,35], and prospective search strategies [52,56,115], we premise this is attainable. Second, it is possible to show that the signature's E T is driven by two neutrinos since (a) the cross-section ratio of pp → + − E T with respect to different lepton flavors is fixed by oscillation data (see section 5.4), and (b) the kinematic distributions of , , and E T are constrained since h ∓ → ∓ ν is a two-body decay involving (approximately) two massless states.…”
Section: Establishing Non-conservation Of Lepton Number At the Lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%