2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2084-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-quark production and QCD

Abstract: We review theoretical calculations for top-quark production that include complete next-to-leading-order QCD corrections as well as higher-order soft-gluon corrections from threshold resummation. We discuss in detail the differences between various approaches that have appeared in the literature and review results for top-quark total cross sections and differential distributions at the Tevatron and the LHC.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
(383 reference statements)
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of these events has led, for example, to a top mass determination of M t = 173.18 ± 0.94GeV [1], corresponding to a relative error of about half percent. The total production cross section σ tt = 7.65 ± 0.42 pb [2] determined at Tevatron is in very good agreement with the theory predictions [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The same is true for the cross section measurements performed at the LHC [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The analysis of these events has led, for example, to a top mass determination of M t = 173.18 ± 0.94GeV [1], corresponding to a relative error of about half percent. The total production cross section σ tt = 7.65 ± 0.42 pb [2] determined at Tevatron is in very good agreement with the theory predictions [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The same is true for the cross section measurements performed at the LHC [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The resummation of these large logarithmic contributions has been performed in recent years, both in momentum space with Soft Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) techniques [20][21][22] and in Mellin space [23][24][25]. In the latter case one finds [24] …”
Section: Jhep08(2015)076mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of phenomenological studies have been presented in the literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Critical comparisons of the various approaches can be found in refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%