1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf01104378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological abelian groups with a Dedekind lattice of closed subgroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The endomorphism η : W → D ∩ U extends to a continuous homomorphism η : W + D → D which restricts to the identity on D. Therefore, setting R := ker( η) G = D ⊕ R is a splitting. Now we offer a new and short argument for the following result of Mukhin [10]. Proof.…”
Section: Some Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The endomorphism η : W → D ∩ U extends to a continuous homomorphism η : W + D → D which restricts to the identity on D. Therefore, setting R := ker( η) G = D ⊕ R is a splitting. Now we offer a new and short argument for the following result of Mukhin [10]. Proof.…”
Section: Some Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the class of topologically modular groups fails to be closed under the formation of strict projective limits and (local) products as the following example, due to Mukhin shows (see [10] which will be reproduced in Example 2.11 below). Example 2.10.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Locally compact abelian topologically modular groups were classified by Mukhin in [37]. We now discuss the nonabelian situation.…”
Section: Application 2: the Classification Of Topologically Modular Gmentioning
confidence: 99%