2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2017.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topologically independent sets in precompact groups

Abstract: It is a simple fact that a subgroup generated by a subset A of an abelian group is the direct sum of the cyclic groups a , a ∈ A if and only if the set A is independent. In [2] the concept of an independent set in an abelian group was generalized to a topologically independent set in a topological abelian group (these two notions coincide in discrete abelian groups). It was proved that a topological subgroup generated by a subset A of an abelian topological group is the Tychonoff direct sum of the cyclic topol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Topologically independent sets were introduced in [1, Definition 4.1] in an arbitrary abelian topological group. For further properties of these sets in precompact groups we refer to [7].…”
Section: The Main Technical Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Topologically independent sets were introduced in [1, Definition 4.1] in an arbitrary abelian topological group. For further properties of these sets in precompact groups we refer to [7].…”
Section: The Main Technical Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given n ∈ N arbitrarily, by (5) we can fix a finite set B ⊂ A \ {a} and an indexed set (r n b ) b∈B of reals such that (7) a…”
Section: The Main Technical Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this result does not answer Problem 1.2, since its actual proof gives no clue on how to get a generating set for G. Thus, Question 1.2, remains still open so far. Incidently, Dikranjan, Shakhmatov and Spevak have investigated the continuity of mappings defined on weak direct sums (see [3,23]). However, their results go in a different direction and Question 1.2 is not touched there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%