1979
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(79)90247-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torsion without torsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it is not possible to perform MCP and maintain U (1) gauge invariance for non vanishing torsion pseudo-trace. Even in the case where the pseudo-trace vanishes, from (7) we thus come to the conclusion that is not possible to attain MCP, unless one is willing to modify either the usual U (1) gauge invariance of electromagnetism or the notion of MCP. In effect, in [8], a different notion of MCP was used, where one only demands MCP at the level of differential forms, with the exterior derivative being replaced by a covariant exterior derivative (d → D), called "Semi-Minimal Coupling Procedure" (SMCP).…”
Section: Gauge Invariance and Mcp Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, it is not possible to perform MCP and maintain U (1) gauge invariance for non vanishing torsion pseudo-trace. Even in the case where the pseudo-trace vanishes, from (7) we thus come to the conclusion that is not possible to attain MCP, unless one is willing to modify either the usual U (1) gauge invariance of electromagnetism or the notion of MCP. In effect, in [8], a different notion of MCP was used, where one only demands MCP at the level of differential forms, with the exterior derivative being replaced by a covariant exterior derivative (d → D), called "Semi-Minimal Coupling Procedure" (SMCP).…”
Section: Gauge Invariance and Mcp Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where φ (x) is a scalar field whose gradient gives the trace part of the torsion tensor. This formalism is known as the Hojman-Rosenbaum-Ryan-Shepley propagating torsion (HRRS model) and has been developed, in particular, for non-Abelian gauge theories in [7]. The second formalism, which we refer to as Saa's theory, represents a change in the MCP procedure by modification of the definition of the invariant volume form [8,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more satisfactory approach have been introduced by Hojman, et al [31], where a new minimal coupling procedure has been devised to allow for a nonvanishing torsion in the definition of an Abelian gauge field strength. Then, it was shorty generalized for a non-abelian field as well [32]. In this procedure, one defines the gauge transformation to allow a set of space-time functions b α µ into the the definition of a covariant derivative such that; D µ = ∇ µ − igb α µ A α .…”
Section: Source Of Torsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the inflationary models the cosmic inflation is powered by a spin-0 matter, so it is more convenient to assume the case when the torsion potential is constructed by a scalar field ϕ(x), sometimes it is called tlaplon field [71,72], which serves as torsion potential. Thus we can reformulate the f (T ) theory in terms of tlaplon field with an FRW background, so we take…”
Section: B Torsion Potential Of a Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%