1977
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(77)90332-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total fusion cross sections for 18, 17, 16O + 27Al at energies near the Coulomb barrier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fit shows clearly the incompatibility between our model and the results of several groups. The agreement is very good with the experimental data of Eisen et al [42] and of Lee et al [43]. The data of Dauk et al [44] are not consistent with our model and with the data at higher energies.…”
Section: Extrapolation To Other Systems Many Systemssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The fit shows clearly the incompatibility between our model and the results of several groups. The agreement is very good with the experimental data of Eisen et al [42] and of Lee et al [43]. The data of Dauk et al [44] are not consistent with our model and with the data at higher energies.…”
Section: Extrapolation To Other Systems Many Systemssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The quest for understanding of the reaction mechanism with the 16 O+ 27 Al reaction already started as early as 1959 [2]. Since then, along with continuous development of experimental techniques, numerous measurements were carried out for this system to identify, e.g., interplay between incomplete fusion and projectile breakup processes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], and the mechanism of complete fusion [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Measurements for deep-inelastic and transfer processes were also performed [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 O + 26 Mg: data taken from [66,28] in NRV. 16 O + 27 Al: data taken from [67,68,57,69,70,71,72,73,74] in NRV. 35 Cl + 27 Al: data taken from [75] in NRV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%