2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total hip arthroplasty for Crowe IV hip without subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy -a long term follow up study

Abstract: BackgroundSeveral authors reported encouraging results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for Crowe IV hips performed using shortening osteotomy. However, few papers have documanted the results of THA for Crowe IV hips without shortening osteotomy. The aim of the present study was to assess the long term-results of cemented THAs for Crowe group IV hips performed without subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy.MethodsWe have assessed the long term results of 27 cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed without … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
3
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
20
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The postoperative JOA score was favorable without any significant difference between the H and control group, and between the FO and N-FO group. The JOA score in patients with high hip dislocation was not much different from previous reports [Kawai T et al, 2014]. Although no significant difference was detected, the JOA score tended to be poor in the cases with femoral osteotomy (FO group).…”
Section: Promscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The postoperative JOA score was favorable without any significant difference between the H and control group, and between the FO and N-FO group. The JOA score in patients with high hip dislocation was not much different from previous reports [Kawai T et al, 2014]. Although no significant difference was detected, the JOA score tended to be poor in the cases with femoral osteotomy (FO group).…”
Section: Promscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The postoperative JOA score was favorable without any signi cant difference between the H and control groups, and between the FO and N-FO groups. The JOA score in the patients with high hip dislocation was not much different from those in previous reports [Kawai T et al, 2014]. Although no signi cant difference was detected, the JOA score tended to be poor in the cases with femoral osteotomy (FO group).…”
Section: Promscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…There were 12 men (12 hips, 19.3%) and 46 women (48 hips, 80.7%) with a mean age of 41.3 (range 16-69) years. The mean body mass index was 22.9 kg/ m 2 (range 15.8-35.1), and the mean duration of follow-up was 12.3 years (range [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Patient Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All radiographic measurements were analyzed twice, each by 2 investigators who had not participated in the index surgery. Preoperative LLD was calculated using the height difference of the lines crossing the prominent points of LT and parallel to the lines passing the lowest points of the teardrop [19]. When the deformation of LT was too severe, the tip of the greater trochanter was used as the reference [26].…”
Section: Radiographic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%