2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60413-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Abdominal Hysterectomy in the Presence of a Large Uterus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
25
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9,11,25,31 The operating time in our series was similar to times reported in the literature. 9,11,16,17,32 Our results are similar to those reported to date, showing that TLH can be performed safely with shorter hospitalization. LH performed on an outpatient basis has been reported to be safe, well tolerated and cost effective, and is therefore advocated by some authors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9,11,25,31 The operating time in our series was similar to times reported in the literature. 9,11,16,17,32 Our results are similar to those reported to date, showing that TLH can be performed safely with shorter hospitalization. LH performed on an outpatient basis has been reported to be safe, well tolerated and cost effective, and is therefore advocated by some authors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our data are similar to those reported elsewhere with respect to patient demographics, uterine size, operation time, and operative morbidity. [16][17] By reducing the amount of time spent as an inpatient, patients are exposed to fewer nosocomial infections, in theory decreasing the risk of iatrogenic infections. 6 TLH also could be performed successfully in most obese patients, [18][19] and operating room times are comparable to those of abdominal hysterectomies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several publications have reported that TLH can be performed in cases where patients have enlarged uteri [30,31]. However, in our study, uterine weight is a significant risk factor of conversion to laparotomy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The average operative time for the second 100 robotic cases is also lower than other published roboticassisted benign hysterectomy studies, which range from 127.8 to 254 min [15,16,18,20,21]. This reported time is also on par with [11,13,[27][28][29][30][31] or lower than [12,[32][33][34] operating times for abdominal hysterectomies (range 58-130 min). The average estimated blood loss of 68.8 cc included patients undergoing RALH plus adnexal surgery (BSO, USO) or other concomitant procedures (Table 1) and is lower than that reported in other robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy studies (range 78.6-98 cc) [15,18,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%