2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.01.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total reflection X-ray fluorescence mercury analysis after immobilization on quartz surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although CDI and GOPS surfaces provided similar densities of immobilized capture probe, CDI-activated surfaces allowed much greater hybridization densities than GOPSfunctionalized surfaces (0.072±0.02 versus 0.013± 0.003 pmol/cm 2 ). There are a few published reports describing directly linking proteins and ligands to inorganic substrates by CDI activation [12, 41]; however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report immobilizing DNA directly to a silicon substrate via CDI activation. These results suggest that such a bioconjugation chemistry provides a viable alternative to the more traditional organofunctional silane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, although CDI and GOPS surfaces provided similar densities of immobilized capture probe, CDI-activated surfaces allowed much greater hybridization densities than GOPSfunctionalized surfaces (0.072±0.02 versus 0.013± 0.003 pmol/cm 2 ). There are a few published reports describing directly linking proteins and ligands to inorganic substrates by CDI activation [12, 41]; however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report immobilizing DNA directly to a silicon substrate via CDI activation. These results suggest that such a bioconjugation chemistry provides a viable alternative to the more traditional organofunctional silane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of many optical biosensors [911], it is important to limit the distance between the sensor surface and the immobilized probe in order to contain the hybridization event within the region of highest optical intensity. There are a few recent reports on conjugation of various ligands [12] and proteins [13] to silicon supports by 1,1-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), indicating that it may be possible to directly link DNA capture probes to silicon substrates. Bypassing the need for a silane monolayer would bring the hybridization event closer to the substrate, a potential benefit to label-free detections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other analytical methods for mercury content determination are presented in many publications [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. They are based on the following detection methods:…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, solid-state polymer-based membranes have been found versatile, selective, and easy to apply, since detection limits lower than ug•L −1 can be achieved with an energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) (Hatzistavros and Kallithrakas-Kontos, 2014), a total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) technique (Aretaki et al, 2006;Koulouridakis and Kallithrakas-Kontos, 2004) or even with a benchtop TXRF system (Marguí et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%