2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward a radiometric ice clock: uranium ages of the Dome C ice core

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means of estimating the recoil ejection factor has yielded ice core ages (based on the accumulation of 238 U decay recoil products from dust trapped within the ice) comparable to independently obtained ages (Aciego et al, 2011).…”
Section: Recoil Loss Factor F Amentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This means of estimating the recoil ejection factor has yielded ice core ages (based on the accumulation of 238 U decay recoil products from dust trapped within the ice) comparable to independently obtained ages (Aciego et al, 2011).…”
Section: Recoil Loss Factor F Amentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Also U / Th dating has been developed for ice cores and applied to the EDC ice core. This provided accurate ages, however, the error is on the order of 25 % for 800 000 yr old ice and becomes substantially larger for 1.5 million yr (Aciego et al, 2011). Absolute age markers are also provided by maxima in the 10 Be deposition flux caused by anomalous 10 Be production rates during geomagnetic anomalies.…”
Section: Future Reconnaissance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the comminution method appears to yield relatively trustworthy absolute ages where sediment provenance is relatively simple, fine-grained sediment is formed rapidly and where sediment transport and storage are limited (e.g., glacially produced sediment deposited in the Kings River Fan, California; Lee et al, 2010) or where the sediments are subject to minimal post-depositional weathering (e.g., dust trapped in ice sheets; Aciego et al, 2011). However, this study suggests that the comminution approach has, at present, limited applicability and accuracy for sediment deposited within catchments involving of multiple sediment sources and proven non-secular equilibrium source material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly employed methods are at present based upon either a weighted geometric estimation (DePaolo et al, 2006) using sample grain size distributions and assumptions for surface roughness and grain aspect ratio, or measurements of specific surface area (e.g., Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) gas adsorption measurements) with an incorporated fractal correction Aciego et al, 2011) to account for the significant difference between the size of the adsorbed gas molecule (commonly N 2 : 0.354 nm) and the recoil length scale (~20-50 nm; Hashimoto et al, 1985;Ziegler, 1996) (see the appendix for fα calculation equations and input parameter details). As pointed out by previous authors of the few comminution studies undertaken so far (e.g., Lee et al, 2010;Handley et al, in press) the technique holds significant potential, but much more work is required before it can be considered as an accurate dating tool.…”
Section: Comminution Age Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation