Toward a total morality of supply chain acts

Abstract

PurposeIn response to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights from 2011, several governments are enacting laws against exploitation in global supply chains. Such a legislative proposal is problematic in several respects. The authors aim to discuss these problems from an ethical perspective to provide a theoretical basis for law-setting and management decisions.Design/methodology/approachThe paper studies the question based on an ethical framework with a libertarian focus.FindingsFrom the perspective of a property rights-based ethics such a proposal prohibits voluntary exchanges and, thereby, a fundamental human right. From a utilitarian perspective it diminishes the utility of the parties of a potential exchange, because they cannot engage an exchange that they want to make. Moreover, it does not only shift an original state task to companies, but also tries to enforce specific values which are not shared all over the world, in third countries. In addition, it creates considerable restrictions on foreign procurement markets for domestic companies, which counteract the actual objective of the law.Research limitations/implicationsThe research provides managers with a moral compass regarding their supply chain decisions based on property rights ethics and utilitarian considerations. Based on that, they can weigh the arguments and make an informed decision. The paper is limited to these approaches that are often neglected in the public debate.Practical implicationsThe authors’ comprehensive discussion from the perspective of libertarian ethics can be helpful for managers in their decision-making.Social implicationsSupply chain acts have important social implications for people in developing countries as well as companies and consumers in Western countries. This study offers a comprehensive discussion from the perspective of libertarian ethics and can be helpful for entrepreneurs and managers in their decision-making.Originality/valueThe paper intends to encourage researchers from different disciplines to discuss the ethics of supply chain acts and to reflect governmental plans to transform the UN Guiding Principles in national law. It provides managers with a moral compass regarding their supply chain decisions based on property rights ethics and utilitarian considerations. Based on that, they can weigh the arguments and make an informed decision.

The dark side of shareholder orientation: A reflection of Rappaport's concept of shareholder value

“…Rather, building a reputation (e.g., Gerbaulet, (2016) with other market participants is a basic prerequisite and, to that extent, a necessary condition for making profits (von Mises, 1998 [1949]). Owing to consumer sovereignty and high competition in many markets, corporations must naturally orient their actions to the needs of their customers (e.g., Bagus et al, 2022). Despite all the powers the entrepreneur wields, von Mises (1998) [1949]:270) brings it to the point:

The captain is the consumer.

…”

Supply Chain Management: A Structured Narrative Review of Current Challenges and Recommendations for Action

“…The IoT, data analytics, and (interactive, immersive, and cross-reality) visualization methods [134] increase SCs' real-time transparency, support decision-making, and make data a key resource and the ability to exploit data as a key process for information flow management [40]. Emergent regulations, exemplified by the Supply Chain Act, and the growing need for accessible and traceable information are compelling SCs to enhance transparency, ensure human rights adherence, establish mechanisms for addressing grievances, and furnish comprehensive activity reports [135]. Customers demand detailed and up-to-date information about products or services; e.g., providing digital twins for each connector is a prerequisite for selling them [121].…”