Toward Evidence-Based Practice with Domestic Violence Perpetrators

Corvo, Kenneth; Dutton, Donald G.; Chen, Wan Yi

doi:10.1080/10926770801921246

Cited by 49 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 70 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…More recent studies and reviews of batterer interventions have reported equivocal or less than robust findings (Corvo, Dutton, & Chen, 2008;Dunford, 2000;Feder & Wilson, 2005;Gondolf, 2007;2011;Jackson et al, 2003;Murphy & Ting, 2010;Saunders, 2008;Smedslund, Dalsbø, Steiro, Winsvold, & Clench-Aas, 2011;Stover, Meadows, & Kaufman, 2009). Jackson et al (2003) reported discouraging BIP results based on randomized trials using large samples from Broward County, Florida, and Brooklyn, New York.…”

Section: This Study Examined Changes In the Beliefs And Behaviors Of mentioning

confidence: 91%

Outcomes From a Duluth Model Batterer Intervention Program at Completion and Long Term Follow-Up

Herman

Rotunda

Williamson

et al. 2014

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: This Study Examined Changes In the Beliefs And Behaviors Of mentioning

confidence: 91%

Outcomes From a Duluth Model Batterer Intervention Program at Completion and Long Term Follow-Up

Herman

Rotunda

Williamson

et al. 2014

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This approach failed in its mission to curb all DV and reduce recidivism (Babcock, Green, & Robie, 2004;Feder & Dugan, 2002;Murphy & Baxter, 1997) as it excluded women as perpetrators of DV (Bowen, 2009) and was based on an ideological model that was not scientifically informed (Corvo & Dutton, 2008;Dutton & Corvo, 2006;Feder & Wilson, 2005;Ganley, 2006;Gondolf, 1997). It failed almost all clinical research outcome studies for efficacy (Babcock et al, 2004;Feder & Dugan, 2002;Feder & Wilson, 2005;Ganley, 2006;Gondolf, 1997;Murphy & Baxter, 1997) despite many intervention strategies (Roberts, 2002).…”

Section: Why a "One Size Fits All" Model Did Not Workmentioning

confidence: 95%

Multi-tiered Group Therapy Model to Identify and Treat the Root Causes of Domestic Violence: A Proposal Integrating Current Social Neuroscience Findings

Lothstein¹

2015

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Domestic violence (DV) is a national public health crisis. The leading treatment model, the Duluth Model, has failed to reduce or prevent DV. New models of treatment for DV are needed. In this paper, an emphasis is placed on an integrated multimodal approach to treating DV, integrating the current psychological science on the neurobiology and brain science of human violence with recent findings in the neurobiology of group relationships to present a treatment program for DV employing a group therapy model. This group therapy treatment approach moves away from the treatment of symptoms to the treatment of the root causes of violence. The two-tier Duluth model (a community teaching model of psychoeducation and court-mandated behavioral therapies for male perpetrators) is expanded to include a third tier. This is a psychological science-driven model that identifies and treats the root causes of DV using a group process and group systems-oriented approach.

show abstract

“…El otro lo constituyen sujetos que reconocen un mayor número de agresiones físicas menores (CTS-2) y que obtienen puntuaciones significativamente superiores La violencia dentro de la pareja constituye un problema social grave y un importante reto para investigadores e instituciones implicadas en su erradicación. En la escena internacional es permanente el debate sobre la estrategia más adecuada para mejorar tanto la intervención con el agresor como la seguridad de las víctimas (Corvo, Dutton & Chen, 2008;Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2010;Saunders, 2008). Los principales revisiones realizadas sobre la eficacia de los tratamientos dirigidos a hombres violentos con la pareja muestran que se han obtenido resultados discretos (Babcock, Green & Robie, 2004;Feder & Wilson, 2005;Murphy & Ting, 2010;Sartin, Hansen & Huss, 2006;Saunders, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Tipología de hombres condenados por violencia de género en un contexto de intervención psicológica en la comunidad

Boira¹,

Jodrá²

2013

RLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the study a sample of 61 convicted male batterers who participated in a psychological intervention program provided in the community. The aim is to classify the participants in homogeneous groups in order to detect their differences and similarities and, in particular, those concerning their evaluation of the intervention program. Data from the participants were collected by means of a semi-structured interview, an evaluation based on their expectations and the usefulness of the program, together with the administration of the following instruments: SCL-90-R, IRI, BDHI, IPDMV, MCMI-II and CTS-2. The batterers were classified using cluster analysis and the results suggest the existence of 2 clusters with a strong internal consistency. One cluster is composed by male batterers who are emotionally more stable, with lower drug use rates and a less intense expression of violence. The other group is composed by men who recognized a higher number of minor physical aggressions (CTS-2), with highest scores in the antisocial, passive-aggressive and schizotypal personality dimensions, and also the highest ResumenEste estudio analiza una muestra de 61 hombres que participaron en un programa de intervención psicológica en la comunidad dirigido a sujetos condenados por un delito de violencia de género. El objetivo es clasificar a los participantes en grupos homogéneos con el fin de detectar sus diferencias y semejanzas, y en particular determinar si valoran de manera distinta el programa de intervención. La información sobre los integrantes de la muestra ha sido obtenida a través de una entrevista semiestructurada, una valoración de sus expectativas ante el tratamiento y la utilidad de éste, y mediante la aplicación de los cuestionarios SCL-90-R, IRI, BDHI, IPDMV, MCMI-II y CTS-2. La clasificación de los sujetos se ha realizado mediante análisis clúster y los resultados evidencian la existencia de 2 grupos con una fuerte cohesión interna. Uno lo forman individuos más estables emocionalmente, con menor consumo de sustancias y una expresión de la violencia de menor intensidad. El otro lo constituyen sujetos que reconocen un mayor número de agresiones físicas menores (CTS-2) y que obtienen puntuaciones significativamente superiores

show abstract

Toward Evidence-Based Practice with Domestic Violence Perpetrators

Cited by 49 publications

References 70 publications

Outcomes From a Duluth Model Batterer Intervention Program at Completion and Long Term Follow-Up

Outcomes From a Duluth Model Batterer Intervention Program at Completion and Long Term Follow-Up

Multi-tiered Group Therapy Model to Identify and Treat the Root Causes of Domestic Violence: A Proposal Integrating Current Social Neuroscience Findings

Tipología de hombres condenados por violencia de género en un contexto de intervención psicológica en la comunidad

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About