Toward quantifying soft power: the impact of the proliferation of information technology on governance in the Middle East

Abstract

This study examines how information technology and mass communication outlets have been employed as soft power platforms in the Middle East in the aftermath of 9/11/2001. The focus is on Internet access and mobile phone subscriptions to see how their proliferation has impacted government effectiveness and political stability in MENA nations from 2004 to 2014. The analysis is centred in the context of increased American investment in soft power programs in the region with the goal of reducing instability and anti-Western sentiments. We examine the nature of such investment in relation to information technology dependence. Understanding that the necessary technology is a product of Western-centric multinationals, we study the interplay between imports, foreign aid and foreign direct investment (FDI), as direct metrics of foreign capital intensity and our explanatory variables -Internet and mobile technology usage rates. The results suggest that information technology platforms contribute to improved governance, while foreign aid has a negative impact. We further examine if increased government effectiveness and stability attracted FDI, as a representation for a positive outcome of improved governance, and find that such governmental efficacy was a successful predictor of foreign direct investment growth, while political stability was not. This article is published as part of a collection on soft power.

Debunking warfare narratives: the role of commercial satellites in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict

“…Determining the truth becomes challenging, especially when the capacity to verify information from leaders is compromised by the suppression or control of free and opposing voices. In the era of technology, information has emerged as a novel form of soft power, transforming the global dynamics of power [17]. This transformation has introduced complexities, opening avenues for various actors to influence political dynamics and reshaping our conventional understanding of warfare.…”

The great powers in Central America: US response to Chinese activities in the region

“…The most salient hard and soft power tools, according to relevant literature (Anguelov & Kaschel, 2017; Apodaca, 2017; Baldwin, 1985; Fraczek et al, 2015, pp. 97–100; Nye, 2009, p. 162), are…”

Battlefield of global ranking: How do power rivalries shape soft power index building?

“…Another factor that plagues the resource-centered measurement approach is its challenge in capturing soft power effects. Scholars, including Nye, resort to attitude changes in the poll as a signal of soft power effects (Nye, 2008; Smith, 2007; Treverton & Jones, 2005), while others insist on policy change as a reference for soft power evaluation (Anguelov & Kaschel, 2017; Knack, 2004). However, what makes effect-oriented approaches dubious is the ambiguity of opinion formation and policy-making systems, which resembles a black box that can never be dissected to analyze the actual proportion of the contribution of soft power initiatives (Layne, 2010).…”