2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a common standard – A reporting checklist for web-based stated preference valuation surveys and a critique for mode surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A seminal paper by Menegaki et al [11] compiled a checklist from studies conducted around the world; the authors recommend that it should be reported when the stated preference valuation method is used. Although the checklist is for a web-based survey, it can also be applied for personal interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A seminal paper by Menegaki et al [11] compiled a checklist from studies conducted around the world; the authors recommend that it should be reported when the stated preference valuation method is used. Although the checklist is for a web-based survey, it can also be applied for personal interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a dearth of information on design strategies for optimizing participation rates in web surveys of establishments. One of the most important design decisions affecting the response rate is the choice of contact mode used to deliver the web survey invitation and any subsequent reminders (Millar & Dillman, 2011; Menegaki, Olsen, & Tsagarakis, 2016). E-mail and paper are the most commonly used contact modes for delivering web survey invitations and reminders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the emissions of air pollutants, such as sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, ozone, particulate matters, human health effects, such as mortality and morbidity, agriculture production, material damages, and so on can be further considered. CE technique is a good candidate for dealing with the issue because CE is quite useful in valuing a multi-dimensional or multi-attribute goods [30,31]. Although the CV approach that is adopted in this study provides information about the value arising from just a specified change, the CE approach can supply information about the value arising from a variety of changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%