2013
DOI: 10.2471/blt.12.114447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a framework convention on global health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least in principle, WHO is the only international institution capable to intervene imposing a clear indictment of products, practices, and processes that are proven to be hazardous to health, and could do so through international binding agreements. The adoption of a legally binding global health treaty-a framework convention on global health grounded in the right to health, with WHO at the center of the convention regime has been proposed by a global coalition of civil society and academics-the Joint Action and Learning Initiative on National and Global Responsibilities for Health (JALI) (Gostin et al 2013). However, a new framework convention to indict at least those substances and products that WHO itself has already recognized as hazardous to health, could represent a valuable first step (Westra 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least in principle, WHO is the only international institution capable to intervene imposing a clear indictment of products, practices, and processes that are proven to be hazardous to health, and could do so through international binding agreements. The adoption of a legally binding global health treaty-a framework convention on global health grounded in the right to health, with WHO at the center of the convention regime has been proposed by a global coalition of civil society and academics-the Joint Action and Learning Initiative on National and Global Responsibilities for Health (JALI) (Gostin et al 2013). However, a new framework convention to indict at least those substances and products that WHO itself has already recognized as hazardous to health, could represent a valuable first step (Westra 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have identified how the rights of children under international law may be affected by food marketing, and the implications for States . There have also been calls for new international treaties on healthy diets and obesity, global health, and alcohol . In 2018, the United Nations circulated the first draft of a treaty on business and human rights, with implications for transnational tobacco, alcohol, food, and beverage corporations…”
Section: Guidance For States and Civil Society On The Human Rights–bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could imply that the legal functions of the WHO, specifically the legislative and executive authority, in addressing global health threats should be strengthened. One can think here of deepening the International Health Regulations (IHR) (Gostin & Sridhar, ), or even a much further reaching Framework Convention on Global health, that would serve as a legal umbrella for the further management responsibilities of states to address global “bads” and strengthening GPGH (Gostin et al, ).…”
Section: Four Functions For Global Health Governance In the Context Omentioning
confidence: 99%