Proceedings of the ACM 14th International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2064676.2064682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a more straightforward and more expressive metamodel for SDW modeling

Abstract: There are works that propose metamodels for SDW modeling. However, we observe that most of these works defines metamodels that mix concepts of DW modeling with concepts of the OLAP cube modeling. We disagree with this view, because we understand that a DW is essentially a database, which can be analyzed/queried by any data analysis tool. Moreover, we also note other limitations. For example: the most proposed metamodels 1) do not support important techniques for DW modeling and 2) represent the spatiality in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we have provided a comparative analysis of the SDWM approach (Del Aguila et al, 2011;Cuzzocrea & Fidalgo, 2012a;Cuzzocrea & Fidalgo, 2012b) against the state-of-the-art SDW meta-model proposals (Fidalgo et al, 2004;Malinowski & Zimányi, 2007;Glorio & Trujillo, 2008). Results of our analysis clearly state that the SDWM proposal exposes a higher expressive power and allows us to obtain more concise and compact SDW schemas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we have provided a comparative analysis of the SDWM approach (Del Aguila et al, 2011;Cuzzocrea & Fidalgo, 2012a;Cuzzocrea & Fidalgo, 2012b) against the state-of-the-art SDW meta-model proposals (Fidalgo et al, 2004;Malinowski & Zimányi, 2007;Glorio & Trujillo, 2008). Results of our analysis clearly state that the SDWM proposal exposes a higher expressive power and allows us to obtain more concise and compact SDW schemas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Spatial Data Warehouse Metamodel (SDWM) (Del Aguila et al, 2011;Cuzzocrea & Fidalgo, 2012a;Cuzzocrea & Fidalgo, 2012b) has been provided recently with the goal of effectively supporting the modeling of Spatial Data Warehouses (SDW) (Bédard et al, 2001;Zghal et al, 2003) by adding several contributions. Among these, relevant ones concern with separating the SDW conceptual modeling from the OLAP data cube (Gray et al, 1997) conceptual modeling, supporting SDW complex constructs modeling, and, finally, stereotyping attributes and measures as spatial objects directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…degenerate dimensions, role-playing dimensions and bridge tables) and (ii) represents the spatiality in a SDW stereotyping the dimensions and fact tables as spatial or hybrid, rather than directly stereotyping the attributes/measures as spatial. With aim of overcoming such limitations, we have proposed the Spatial Data Warehouse Metamodel (SDWM) [5]. However, due to space restriction, a more elaborated specification of SDWM cannot be made in our previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%