1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7863(97)00037-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a smart project management information system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies of PMIS have been mostly limited to describing the demographics of project management software usage (Liberatore and Pollack-Johnson, 2003) and to evaluating specific applications of these systems or software modules to support project management tasks such as planning (Amami et al, 1993), communicating and reporting (Brackett and Isbell, 1989), managing risks (Jaafari, 1996), scheduling (Herroelen, 2005), estimating costs (Love and Irani, 2003), and managing documents (Amami and Beghini, 2000). Project management software usage has also been found to have many drawbacks and limitations, both in theory when compared to an ideal PMIS by researchers (Jaafari and Manivong, 1998) and in practice as perceived by project managers (White and Fortune, 2002). The PMIS within the project management system (adapted from Raymond, 1987 (Davis et al, 1989).…”
Section: Research Background and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies of PMIS have been mostly limited to describing the demographics of project management software usage (Liberatore and Pollack-Johnson, 2003) and to evaluating specific applications of these systems or software modules to support project management tasks such as planning (Amami et al, 1993), communicating and reporting (Brackett and Isbell, 1989), managing risks (Jaafari, 1996), scheduling (Herroelen, 2005), estimating costs (Love and Irani, 2003), and managing documents (Amami and Beghini, 2000). Project management software usage has also been found to have many drawbacks and limitations, both in theory when compared to an ideal PMIS by researchers (Jaafari and Manivong, 1998) and in practice as perceived by project managers (White and Fortune, 2002). The PMIS within the project management system (adapted from Raymond, 1987 (Davis et al, 1989).…”
Section: Research Background and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A representative prototype system, IFE (Integrated Facility Engineering), developed by the University of Sydney, takes into consideration the information management of projects (Jaafari and Manivong 1998), visual management of design (Chaaya and Jaafari 1999), information management of construction , dynamic simulation modeling (Doloi and Jaafari 2000), etc. Although the system involves many modules, most of these are simply theoretical models and not applicable to real-life construction projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FUNCTION OF PROJECT OFFICER Project manager may appoint project officer when the project load increase upon him [13]. In the case of big project more than one project officer may be appointed.…”
Section: E Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%