2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00362-018-1029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an uniformly most powerful binomial test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated (8) . The hypothesis of noninferiority of the CVI compared to a 70% agreement was tested using the exact binomial test (Wörz and Bernhardt, 2020) (9) . A significance level of 5% was adopted, and the software used was R Core Team 2022 (Version 4.2.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated (8) . The hypothesis of noninferiority of the CVI compared to a 70% agreement was tested using the exact binomial test (Wörz and Bernhardt, 2020) (9) . A significance level of 5% was adopted, and the software used was R Core Team 2022 (Version 4.2.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foi calculado o índice de validade de conteúdo (IVC) (8) . Testada a hipótese de não inferioridade do IVC em relação a concordância de 70% por meio do teste exato binomial (Wörz e Bernhardt, 2020) (9) . O nível de significância adotado foi de 5% e o software adotado foi o R Core Team 2022 (Versão 4.2.2).…”
Section: Métodounclassified