Towards integrated pest and pollinator management in tropical crops

Merle, Isabelle; Hipólito, Juliana; Réquier, Fabrice

doi:10.1016/j.cois.2021.12.006

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 141 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By focusing on actions that jointly benefit both control of crop pests and crop pollination and minimize conflicts between them, an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management (IPPM) framework, applied in the context of agri‐ecosystems, may help to support both sustainable agricultual production and protection of pollinators. However, recent articles advocating this IPPM approach have arisen mostly in Europe (Belien et al., 2021 ; Egan et al., 2020 ; Lundin et al., 2021 ; Merle et al., 2022 ), North America (Bloom et al., 2022 ; Braman & Griffin, 2022 ; Leach et al., 2022 ; Okosun & Reddy, 2022 ; Pecenka et al., 2023 ; Penn et al., 2021 ), Africa (Adan et al., 2021 ; Toukem et al., 2022 ; Waithaka et al., 2023 ; Wangithi et al., 2022 ), and Asia (Jung, 2021 ; Jung & Shin, 2022 ; Wyckhuys et al., 2023 ), with none arising in Australasia. Sustainable agriculture and pollination …”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pollination crisis Down‐Under: Has Australasia dodged the bullet?

Pyke,

Prendergast,

Ren

2023

Ecology and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since mid‐1990s, concerns have increased about a human‐induced “pollination crisis.” Threats have been identified to animals that act as plant pollinators, plants pollinated by these animals, and consequently human well‐being. Threatening processes include loss of natural habitat, climate change, pesticide use, pathogen spread, and introduced species. However, concern has mostly been during last 10–15 years and from Europe and North America, with Australasia, known as Down‐Under, receiving little attention. So perhaps Australasia has “dodged the bullet”? We systematically reviewed the published literature relating to the “pollination crisis” via Web of Science, focusing on issues amenable to this approach. Across these issues, we found a steep increase in publications over the last few decades and a major geographic bias towards Europe and North America, with relatively little attention in Australasia. While publications from Australasia are underrepresented, factors responsible elsewhere for causing the “pollination crisis” commonly occur in Australasia, so this lack of coverage probably reflects a lack of awareness rather than the absence of a problem. In other words, Australasia has not “dodged the bullet” and should take immediate action to address and mitigate its own “pollination crisis.” Sensible steps would include increased taxonomic work on suspected plant pollinators, protection for pollinator populations threatened with extinction, establishing long‐term monitoring of plant–pollinator relationships, incorporating pollination into sustainable agriculture, restricting the use of various pesticides, adopting an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management approach, and developing partnerships with First Nations peoples for research, conservation and management of plants and their pollinators. Appropriate Government policy, funding and regulation could help.

show abstract

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pollination crisis Down‐Under: Has Australasia dodged the bullet?

Pyke,

Prendergast,

Ren

2023

Ecology and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Contingent settlement and coordination planning, early response, pollution management technology, and strong collaborations with impacted nations, regional and multinational farm research centres, and other organisations are considered monitoring tactics [130,131]. While farmers perform the most significant part in managing several pests and beneficial organisms, they should also know what (if any) the reasonable quantity of pests within the farm will be [132,133]. Various agricultural organisations should accomplish mutual collaboration, but the country's leading institutes should ideally initiate the collaboration.…”

Section: Prevention and Monitoring Of Harmful Organismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Analysis of Integrated Pest Management Practices

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrated pest management (IPM) is a wide-ranging strategy that involves tactics for the structural control of pests and diseases, also known as integrated pest control (IPC). The prime aim of this study is to explore global scientific publications regarding integrated pest management and map the recent global trends in this innovative research domain, thereby providing future research directions based on dynamic observations. Bibliometric assessment is used in the research to provide a more detailed evaluation of the existing state of IPM, which will ultimately lead policymakers to develop novel measures to promote the efficient utilisation of the IPM measure. The study explores the Web of Science (WoS) core collection database covering published articles from 1993 to 2022, and we evaluated 1217 articles. The study employed the Biblioshiny app (V4.1, K-Synth, Naples, Italy), specially designed for the Bibliometrix R package, and a robust Java-based application, namely CiteSpace (V6.2.R3, Chaomei Chen, Philadelphia, PA, USA), to convert, process, visualise and evaluate the selected dataset. Moreover, we utilised another Java-based app VOSViewer (Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands), to provide a comprehensive visualisation. Based on citation analysis, we presented a list of the top 10 articles based on global citation count, the top 10 institutes, the top 10 journals, and the top 10 countries. By carefully evaluating the co-occurrence network, this study structurally represents the 9 clusters and the 20 prime keywords, which will be assisted the future researcher in understanding the key terms used by the prior research and the density criteria. The strategic coordinate mapping is utilised to evaluate the keywords’ inner relationship and provide strong themes of recent research progression of IPM by evaluating the centrality and density quadrant tactics. This technique has not been rehashed previously within the IPM domain. We identify gaps related to the formulation, implementation, and assessment of the IPM mechanisms and propose avenues for future studies to fill those gaps.

show abstract

“…Integrated pest and pollination management (IPPM) is a holistic strategy that synergizes pest management practices and pollination services in an ecologically and economically sustainable manner (Biddinger and Rajotte 2015, Merle et al 2021) especially in pollinator-dependent crops that are highly affected by damaging insect pests, such as cucurbits (Leach et al 2022). IPPM focuses on managing pests while simultaneously mitigating the negative impact of control methods on pollinator health (Biddinger and Rajotte 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactions between integrated pest management, pollinator supplementation, and normalized difference vegetation index in pumpkin, Cucurbita maxima (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), production

Waithaka,

Kasina,

Samita

et al. 2023

Environmental Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable production of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Duchesne) partly relies on integrated pest management (IPM) and pollination services. A farmer-managed field study was carried out in Yatta and Masinga Sub-Counties of Machakos County, Kenya, to determine the effectiveness of a recommended IPM package and its interaction with stingless bee colonies (Hypotrigona sp.) for pollinator supplementation (PS). The IPM package comprised Lynfield traps with cuelure laced with the organophosphate malathion, sprays of Metarhizium anisopliae (Mechnikoff) Sorokin isolate ICIPE 69, the most widely used fungal biopesticide in sub-Saharan Africa, and protein baits incorporating spinosad. Four treatments—IPM, PS, integrated pest and pollinator management (which combined IPM and PS), and control—were replicated 4 times. The experiment was conducted in 600 m2 farms in 2 normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) classes during 2 growing seasons (October 2019–March 2020 and March–July 2020). Fruits showing signs of infestation were incubated for emergence, fruit fly trap catches were counted weekly, and physiologically mature fruits were harvested. There was no effect of IPM, PS, and NDVI on yield across seasons. This study revealed no synergistic effect between IPM and PS in suppressing Tephritid fruit fly population densities and damage. Hypotrigona sp. is not an efficient pollinator of pumpkin. Therefore, we recommend testing other African stingless bees in pumpkin production systems for better pollination services and improved yields.

show abstract

Towards integrated pest and pollinator management in tropical crops

Cited by 15 publications

References 141 publications

Pollination crisis Down‐Under: Has Australasia dodged the bullet?

Pollination crisis Down‐Under: Has Australasia dodged the bullet?

Bibliometric Analysis of Integrated Pest Management Practices

Interactions between integrated pest management, pollinator supplementation, and normalized difference vegetation index in pumpkin, Cucurbita maxima (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About