2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the efficiency limits of silicon solar cells: How thin is too thin?

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIt is currently possible to fabricate crystalline silicon solar cells with the absorber thickness ranging from a few hundreds of micrometres (conventional wafer-based cells) to devices as thin as 1 μm. In this work, we use a model single-junction solar cell to calculate the limits of energy conversion efficiency and estimate the optimal absorber thickness. We have found that the limiting efficiency for cells in the thickness range between 40 and 500 μm is very similar and close to 29%. In this r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent industrial transition to PERC aims to reduce rear surface recombination. With further advancement of surface passivation technology, recent studies [12], [13] suggest that wafer thinning may no longer be as detrimental for conversion efficiency. Better passivation in the rear surface also coincides with an improved optical performance, which also contributes to higher efficiency.…”
Section: Pv Device Simulation: Effect Of Wafer Thickness On Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent industrial transition to PERC aims to reduce rear surface recombination. With further advancement of surface passivation technology, recent studies [12], [13] suggest that wafer thinning may no longer be as detrimental for conversion efficiency. Better passivation in the rear surface also coincides with an improved optical performance, which also contributes to higher efficiency.…”
Section: Pv Device Simulation: Effect Of Wafer Thickness On Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limit for higher efficiency is the FF on which further investigations will have to focus on. Additionally, recent investigations on optimum Si absorber thicknesses point out that 40 µm is the lowest thickness not significantly reducing maximum possible efficiency . Hence, considering to go to thicker absorbers than 10 µm might be an option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion coefficients are taken to be D E = 12.5 cm 2 /s in the n-type emitter and D B = 25 cm 2 /s in the p-type base. We assume a solar cell structure with a 5-nm thick n-type emitter, to minimize recombination losses in this heavily doped layer, and we take optimal doping values [102]: the emitter doping is equal to N d ¼ 1:5 Â 10 18 cm À3 , while the base doping is equal to N a ¼ 10 16 cm À3 .…”
Section: Full Device Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complete analysis of the optimal thickness for a given material quality also in the presence of parasitic losses, and of the requirements to reach a given efficiency target, is given in Ref. [102]. Notice that the short-circuit current is unchanged, unless the diffusion length becomes comparable to or smaller than the cell thickness.…”
Section: Full Device Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation