2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards traceable particle number concentration standard: Single charged aerosol reference (SCAR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S4A, both the PSM and the CPC measured rather high concentrations, ∼10 6 /cm 3 at maximum. The actual counting instruments, CPC models 3775 and 3776, were concentration-calibrated in the laboratory after the field campaign based on the single charged aerosol reference (38). The calibration results were applied in the data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4A, both the PSM and the CPC measured rather high concentrations, ∼10 6 /cm 3 at maximum. The actual counting instruments, CPC models 3775 and 3776, were concentration-calibrated in the laboratory after the field campaign based on the single charged aerosol reference (38). The calibration results were applied in the data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this increased extinction may cause overestimation of the imaginary part of the retrieved complex RI. These potential artifacts and consequent errors may be hindered by nebulizing lower bulk solution concentrations that produce narrower size distributions of particles with smaller size mode diameter, instruments designed for decreasing multiply charged particles concentration (Gupta et al 1989;Uin et al 2009;Yli-Ojanperä et al 2010), or by calculating the artifacts due to multiply charged particles and correcting the measured Q ext values as briefly described in the next section. Alternatively, reliable CRD-AS measurements can be conducted by generating a high concentration of larger particles (400-800 nm in diameter) as the fraction of multiply charged particles at these sizes is minimal because the formed aerosols do not usually contain many larger particles that would lead to doubly charged particles.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above this, the multiple charging limits the precision. However, there are methods to limit this issue, for instance, an additional aerodynamic size selection (Romay-Novas and Pui 1988; Hillamo and Kauppinen 1991;Owen et al 2012) or modifications of the La Mer generator (Sinclair and La Mer 1948), which produce singly charged particles (Uin et al 2009;Yli-Ojanper€ a et al 2010;Yli-Ojanper€ a et al 2012). In 2012, Yli-Ojanper€ a et al successfully applied a modified La Mer generator and a DMA for producing singly charged calibration aerosol and for conducting a FCAE-based number concentration calibration up to 1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%