2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity, genotoxicity and proinflammatory effects of amorphous nanosilica in the human intestinal Caco-2 cell line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, SiNPs addition to culture media significantly increased cellular ROS production and intracellular Ca 2+ accumulation30. Besides direct cytotoxicity, Tarantini et al 31. tested 15 nm and 55 nm sized SiNPs in human intestinal cell lines and observed significantly increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines by the cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, SiNPs addition to culture media significantly increased cellular ROS production and intracellular Ca 2+ accumulation30. Besides direct cytotoxicity, Tarantini et al 31. tested 15 nm and 55 nm sized SiNPs in human intestinal cell lines and observed significantly increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines by the cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in Si levels was only found in the spleen of rats exposed to an oral dose of 2500 mg/kg bw/day (for 84 days) (van der Zande et al 2014), a dose level that exceeds the current recommendations in OECD guidelines by a factor of 2.5. If taken up by cells, SAS particles are usually located in vesicles and endocytic compartments, and also along actin fibres and nuclear invaginations (Tarantini et al 2015b); they are, however, never found in the nucleus. Reports to the contrary always refer to dye-labelled or otherwise modified silicon dioxide.…”
Section: Bioavailability After Oral Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro micronuclei tests were negative in human lymphocytes and BEAS2B cells, inconclusive in undifferentiated Caco-2 cells, and positive in some lung-derived cells at cytotoxic concentrations (NANOGENOTOX 2013; Tarantini et al 2015b; Tavares et al 2014; Zijno et al 2016). The findings of in vitro indicator tests were negative for pyrogenic and hydrated silica under non-cytotoxic conditions (cf.…”
Section: Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocompatibility assessment of silica coated nanoparticles performed in human vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC) and cancer cells derived from the cervix carcinoma (HeLa) showed cell type dependent nanotoxicity15. On the other hand, other studies reported no toxicity or dose-dependent effects in primary human cells16 as well as size-dependent effects17.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%