“…This article, ranked 2nd in terms of total citations with a total of 279, and ranked 1st in terms of CPY with a score of 22.3, had important value in the dosimetry comparative study of prostate cancer. This study suggests that all other approaches yield treatment S2) Type of tumor head and neck cancer 15 (6,11,14,19,20,27,36,39,41,55,64,72,90,91,96) cancers with complex and large targets* 14 (3,9,16,17,35,54,57,62,74,78,88,95,98,99) breast cancer 12 (13, 18, 26, 32, 44, plans of improved quality when compared to 3D-CRT, with HT providing best OAR sparing and VMAT being the most efficient treatment option. This conclusion was supported by other highly cited articles (30)(31)(32).…”