Trade-off and flexibility in the dynamic regulation of the cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase repertoire

Abstract

Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) catalyze the ubiquitylation of substrates many of which are degraded by the 26S proteasome. Their modular architecture enables recognition of numerous substrates via exchangeable substrate receptors that competitively bind to a cullin scaffold with high affinity. Due to the plasticity of these interactions there is ongoing uncertainty how cells maintain a flexible CRL repertoire in view of changing substrate loads. Based on a series of in vivo and in vitro studies, different groups proposed that the exchange of substrate receptors is mediated by a protein exchange factor named cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated 1 (Cand1). Here, we have performed quantitative mathematical modeling to support this hypothesis. To this end we first show that the exchange activity of Cand1 necessarily leads to a trade-off between high ligase activity and fast receptor exchange. Supported by previous in vivo studies we argue that this trade-off yields an optimal Cand1 concentration where the time scale for substrate degradation becomes minimal. In a second step we show through simulations that (i) substrates bias the CRL repertoire leading to preferential assembly of ligases for which substrates are available and (ii) differences in binding affinities create a temporal hierarchy for the degradation of substrates. Together, our results provide general constraints for the operating regimes of molecular exchange systems and suggest that Cand1 endows the CRL network with the properties of an "on demand" system allowing cells to dynamically adjust their CRL repertoire to fluctuating substrate abundances. Author summaryCullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) are multisubunit protein complexes where exchangeable substrate receptors (SRs) assemble on a cullin scaffold to mediate ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation of a large variety of substrates. In humans there are hundreds of different CRLs having potentially thousands of substrates. Due to the high affinity of cullin-SR interactions, it has long been a mystery how cells would maintain flexibility to sample the entire SR repertoire in order to match fluctuating substrate loads. Recent experiments indicate that the exchange of different SRs is mediated by a novel protein exchange factor (Cand1). However, the proposed PLOS 1/15peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/168898 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 26, 2017; biochemical function of Cand1 as a promoter of CRL activity remained difficult to reconcile with previous reports of Cand1 acting as an inhibitor of CRL activity in vitro. Here we show that these two findings are not contradictory, but that the exchange activity of Cand1 necessarily leads to a trade-off between high ligase activity and fast receptor exchange which leads us to predict an optimal Cand1 concentration and a temporal hierarchy for substrate degradation. Our res...

CSN7B defines a variant COP9 signalosome complex with distinct function in DNA damage response

“…By deneddylating cullins, the CSN is a key regulator of CRLs (Deshaies and Joazeiro, 2009;Dubiel et al, 2018;Wolf et al, 2003). CSN-mediated deneddylation protects CRLs from autoubiquitylation (Schmidt et al, 2009;Wee et al, 2005;Zhou et al, 2003) and allows the CRL network to adapt to fluctuations in substrate availability (Dubiel et al, 2013(Dubiel et al, , 2015aLiu et al, 2018;Pierce et al, 2013;Reitsma et al, 2017;Straube et al, 2017;Wu et al, 2013;Zemla et al, 2013).…”

Differential UBE2H-CTLH E2-E3 ubiquitylation modules regulate erythroid maturation

“…One of the best studied E3 ligase complexes are members of the CRL family which engage interchangeable substrate receptor/adapter complexes for substrate-specific ubiquitylation. Substrate receptor assembly is kept in a highly dynamic state (Reitsma et al, 2017;Straube et al, 2017), whereby specific expression of substrate receptors in response to external and internal cellular cues, as well as in a cell-type and tissue specific way, allows the formation of CRLs for selective and efficient client substrate ubiquitylation (Gupta et al, 2013;McGourty et al, 2016;Ravenscroft et al, 2013). Recently, the activity of the multiprotein yeast GID (orthologue of human CTLH complex) was shown to be predominantly regulated by engaging interchangeable substrate receptors, which conceivably target distinct substrates for degradation (Chrustowicz et al, 2021;Kong et al, 2021;Liu & Pfirrmann, 2019;Melnykov et al, 2019;Shin et al, 2021)(Langlois et al 2021 BioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.02.458684).…”

“…We next expanded our analysis to the K562 cells (Figure 6C). Parental and knock-out K562 cell lines were ether treated with NaB to induce erythroid-like or with 12-O-Tetradodecanoyl-phorbol-13 acetate (TPA, chemical activator of PKC kinase) to induce megakaryocyte-like differentiation (Tabilio et al, 1983). Both, NaB and TPA efficiently induced UBE2H protein levels in parental cells suggesting that UBE2H regulation is not restricted to erythroid differentiation (Figure 6D and 6E).…”

Analysis of network motifs in cellular regulation: Structural similarities, input–output relations and signal integration

“…5). Mathematical models have shown that there exist intrinsic trade-offs in molecular exchange systems (Goryachev and Pokhilko, 2006;Straube et al, 2017) which, in the case of the GTPase cycle, predict an optimal concentration for the GEF as a result of a trade-off between high GTPase activity and fast GDP/GTP cycling.…”