2018
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.766.23899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional and confocal descriptions of a new genus and two new species of deep water Cerviniinae Sars, 1903 from the Southern Atlantic and the Norwegian Sea: with a discussion on the use of digital media in taxonomy (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Aegisthidae)

Abstract: Aegisthidae is one of the most abundant and diverse families of harpacticoid copepods living in deep-sea benthos, and the phylogenetic relationships within the family are in state of flux. Females of two new deep-water species of harpacticoid copepods belonging to the Hase gen. n. (Aegisthidae: Cerviniinae) are described. The first taxonomic description of marine copepod species based on the combined use of interference and confocal microscopy for the study of the habitus and dissected appendages is presented … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our molecular analysis confirms the sister relationship between Aegisthinae and here re-defined Pontostratiotinae (which includes members of the Pontostratiotes only) and rejects the monophyly of the former Pontostratiotinae. [24] In this study, the analyzed genera belonging to the Aegisthinae (Aegisthus, Andromastax, Nudivorax, and Jamstecia) have a complex topology (Fig. 1) in which there is no evidence supporting the monophyly of none of the four genera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our molecular analysis confirms the sister relationship between Aegisthinae and here re-defined Pontostratiotinae (which includes members of the Pontostratiotes only) and rejects the monophyly of the former Pontostratiotinae. [24] In this study, the analyzed genera belonging to the Aegisthinae (Aegisthus, Andromastax, Nudivorax, and Jamstecia) have a complex topology (Fig. 1) in which there is no evidence supporting the monophyly of none of the four genera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For confocal microscopy, exoskeletons were individually transferred to distilled water and then stained with Fuchsin (Ivanenko et al 2012; Corgosinho et al 2018). The copepods were inspected using an inverted Nikon A1 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at Lomonosov Moscow State University, using a 40× oil immersion objective and lasers with wavelengths of 532 and 640 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%