2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-78522010000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradução e adaptação transcultural do instrumento de avaliação do quadril "Harris Hip Score"

Abstract: OBJETIVO: O Harris Hip Score é instrumento de avaliação específica, desenvolvido originalmente para avaliar os resultados da artroplastia total de quadril. O objetivo deste estudo foi traduzir e adaptar culturalmente este instrumento para a língua portuguesa. MÉTODO: O método de tradução e adaptação cultural do Harris Hip Score envolveu quatro etapas: 1 - tradução inicial; 2 - retrotradução; 3 - apreciação das versões com elaboração da versão de consenso; 4 - pré-teste comentado com elaboração da versão final.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
40
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We emphasize that even though the mean Harris score of 69.3 found in the present study is low, it is similar to values found by other authors (16) . For a better functional assessment on the patients, we analyzed another two important parameters separately: recovery of walking ability and evolution of the pain scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We emphasize that even though the mean Harris score of 69.3 found in the present study is low, it is similar to values found by other authors (16) . For a better functional assessment on the patients, we analyzed another two important parameters separately: recovery of walking ability and evolution of the pain scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With regard to functional evaluation, the Harris score is the scale used by the majority of authors for postoperative functional assessment of trochanteric fractures (16) . Schipper et al (8) found a mean score of 66.80 (standard deviation = 17.94) with a proximal femoral nail of PFN ® type, and 69.50 (standard deviation = 16.00) with a nail of Gamma Nail ® type, after one year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthopedic surgeons now tend to include, in their therapeutic decision-making process, not only the clinical and radiological findings but also the health-related quality-of-life context, thus placing value both on general quality-of-life outcomes and outcomes according to domains, functional capacity, pain and personal satisfaction (9) . These assessment instruments have been shown to be valuable in determining not only individuals' real health situation and disease manifestations, but also the best time for an operation, which may thus be postponed until social or psychological issues have firstly been attended to and equilibrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is divided between items: pain has greater weight (44 and 47 points), function is divided into activity of daily living (14 points) and travel (33 points), mobility (5 points) and deformity (4 points). The results are evaluated by totaling the domain scores, totals less than 70 is considered bad, reasonable 70-80, 80-90 good and 90-100 excellent [19].…”
Section: International Archives Of Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%