1997
DOI: 10.1002/asna.2113180506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRAFICOS – an Échelle Zeeman spectrograph

Abstract: We describe the TRAnsportable FIbre Coupled kchelle Spectrograph (TRAFICOS) equipped with a Zeeman analyzer and manufactured mainly for the observation of stellar magnetic fields. The IntroductionMagnetic fields are observed on stars with quite different temperatures, masses, and states of evolution. In stars with masses of about one solar mass and smaller and the so-called T-Tauri variable stars the magnetic fields are an important indicator for confirmation of the dynamo theory. in stars with higher masse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a particular difficult task in 53 Cam, owing to a strong blend in the blue wing of the line (Mathys et al 1997). Furthermore, it should be noted that in presence of a such a strong field as observed in 53 Cam, the formation Babcock (1958Babcock ( , 1960b; empty triangles: Preston & Stȩpień (1968); filled circles: Borra & Landstreet (1977); empty stars: Hildebrandt et al (1997); empty circles: Hill et al (1998); filled squares: Wade et al (2000c); open squares: this work (from SAO spectra) filled triangles: this work (from Catania spectra). For the mean field modulus B (left bottom panel), the filled square represents the measurement by Preston (1969), filled triangles the observations by Huchra (1972), filled circles those by Mathys et al (1997).…”
Section: Determinations Of the Mean Field Modulusmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a particular difficult task in 53 Cam, owing to a strong blend in the blue wing of the line (Mathys et al 1997). Furthermore, it should be noted that in presence of a such a strong field as observed in 53 Cam, the formation Babcock (1958Babcock ( , 1960b; empty triangles: Preston & Stȩpień (1968); filled circles: Borra & Landstreet (1977); empty stars: Hildebrandt et al (1997); empty circles: Hill et al (1998); filled squares: Wade et al (2000c); open squares: this work (from SAO spectra) filled triangles: this work (from Catania spectra). For the mean field modulus B (left bottom panel), the filled square represents the measurement by Preston (1969), filled triangles the observations by Huchra (1972), filled circles those by Mathys et al (1997).…”
Section: Determinations Of the Mean Field Modulusmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the first case, we considered only the photopolarimetric B z determinations of Borra & Landstreet (1977) and of Hill et al (1998). In the second case, we considered only the "photographic" B z values of Preston & Stȩpień (1969), Hildebrandt et al (1997), Wade et al (2000c), and those reported in Table 1 of this work. Finally, in the third case, we considered all of the available B z observations (but those by Babcock, see Sect.…”
Section: Field Modelling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the data at our disposal represent 682 additional RVs and extend the time span covered for 4335 days, it was deemed useful to derive an improved quadratic ephemeris based on all 2214 RVs. In addition to the new RVs measured in all Ondřejov and DAO electronic spectra, we also included the RVs of the donor from the Crimean CCD spectra (Skul'skij 1992(Skul'skij , 1993 and from the Tautenburg CCD spectra (Hildebrandt et al 1997) and, of course, used all 1532 RVs already used by Harmanec & Scholz (1993). In all cases, we used mean RVs for each spectrogram.…”
Section: A New Ephemerismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also considered additional measurements, to be published by Mathys et al (in preparation), most of which were already used by Landstreet & Mathys (2000). Additional mean longitudinal field data were taken from Bagnulo et al (2001), Borra & Landstreet (1977, 1978, Hildebrandt et al (1997), Hill et al (1998), Leone et al (2000), Leone & Catanzaro (2001), Preston & Stȩpień (1968), Wade et al (1996Wade et al ( , 1997Wade et al ( , 2000aWade et al ( , 2000bWade et al ( , 2000c. Further mean field modulus data were taken from Huchra (1972), and Preston (1969).…”
Section: Analysis Of Observations: Generalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%