2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage

Abstract: We examined the effect of perceptual training on a well-established hemispheric asymmetry in speech processing. Eighteen listeners were trained to use a within-category difference in voice onset time (VOT) to cue talker identity. Successful learners (n=8) showed faster response times for stimuli presented only to the left ear than for those presented only to the right. The development of a leftear/right-hemisphere advantage for processing a prototypically phonetic cue supports a model of speech perception in w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due in part to the challenge of working with single word stimuli, which are phonetically impoverished compared to full sentences. However, recent work, including that of Francis and Driscoll (2007), González and McLennan (2007), and the present study, has been more consistent in revealing a rightward specialization for talker-specific processing, thus providing converging evidence with results from neuroimaging and neuropsychology for the specialization of right-hemisphere neural circuitry for such tasks. The converging results from these studies may also lend empirical support to models that attribute person identification generally to neural systems situated in the right hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This may be due in part to the challenge of working with single word stimuli, which are phonetically impoverished compared to full sentences. However, recent work, including that of Francis and Driscoll (2007), González and McLennan (2007), and the present study, has been more consistent in revealing a rightward specialization for talker-specific processing, thus providing converging evidence with results from neuroimaging and neuropsychology for the specialization of right-hemisphere neural circuitry for such tasks. The converging results from these studies may also lend empirical support to models that attribute person identification generally to neural systems situated in the right hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Training to categorize non-phonemic auditory signals also enhanced fMRI activation in left posterior superior temporal sulcus (Liebenthal et al, 2010). Inversely, training to associate a brief temporal distinction (along the same dimension that distinguishes /d/ from /t/) to talker identity, rather than speech categories, can cause the opposite shift from left-to right-lateralization (Francis and Driscoll, 2006). Brain morphometric studies also support a critical role of the left temporal area for efficient language learning.…”
Section: Adult Datamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This supports a model of the organization of voice processing in which speech and identity information are processed in partially dissociated cortical regions. Francis & Driscoll (2006) trained their subjects to use voice onset time (VOT) to cue speaker identity. Successful learners showed shorter response times for stimuli presented only to the left ear than for those presented only to the right.…”
Section: Auditory Modality: Lateralization Of Voice Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%