2022
DOI: 10.5603/fm.a2021.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transantral intraseptal sinuous canal

Abstract: This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Folia Morphologica" are listed in PubMed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CS prevalence was reported to be between 15.7% and 100% by Rusu et al [19], and Aoki et al [20] stated that 54.14% of the patients had bilateral CS presence; however, in this study, 100% of the cases had ACs and 95.60% of the patients had bilateral canals, which is the highest percentage recorded in the literature. There are multiple factors…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CS prevalence was reported to be between 15.7% and 100% by Rusu et al [19], and Aoki et al [20] stated that 54.14% of the patients had bilateral CS presence; however, in this study, 100% of the cases had ACs and 95.60% of the patients had bilateral canals, which is the highest percentage recorded in the literature. There are multiple factors…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The CS prevalence was reported to be between 15.7% and 100% by Rusu et al [19], and Aoki et al [20] stated that 54.14% of the patients had bilateral CS presence; however, in this study, 100% of the cases had ACs and 95.60% of the patients had bilateral canals, which is the highest percentage recorded in the literature. There are multiple factors which can lead to this result, as the imaging modality, voxel sizes, inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, observer's experience, and presence/absence of artefacts can affect the number of cases [4,[10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18]21,22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The CT data were analyzed using the iCatVision software and its related application 3DVR v5.0.0.3. The CBCT files were further exported as DICOM files, which were additionally analyzed with the Planmeca Romexis Viewer 3.5.0.R software (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%