Transcriptional analysis of liver from chickens with fast (meat bird), moderate (F1 layer x meat bird cross) and low (layer bird) growth potential

Abstract

BackgroundDivergent selection for meat and egg production in poultry has resulted in strains of birds differing widely in traits related to these products. Modern strains of meat birds can reach live weights of 2 kg in 35 d, while layer strains are now capable of producing more than 300 eggs per annum but grow slowly. In this study, RNA-Seq was used to investigate hepatic gene expression between three groups of birds with large differences in growth potential; meat bird, layer strain as well as an F1 layer x meat bird. The objective was to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes between all three strains to elucidate biological factors underpinning variations in growth performance.ResultsRNA-Seq analysis was carried out on total RNA extracted from the liver of meat bird (n = 6), F1 layer x meat bird cross (n = 6) and layer strain (n = 6), males. Differential expression of genes were considered significant at P < 0.05, and a false discovery rate of < 0.05, with any fold change considered. In total, 6278 genes were found to be DE with 5832 DE between meat birds and layers (19%), 2935 DE between meat birds and the cross (9.6%) and 493 DE between the cross and layers (1.6%). Comparisons between the three groups identified 155 significant DE genes. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of the 155 DE genes showed the FoxO signalling pathway was most enriched (P = 0.001), including genes related to cell cycle regulation and insulin signalling. Significant GO terms included ‘positive regulation of glucose import’ and ‘cellular response to oxidative stress’, which is also consistent with FoxOs regulation of glucose metabolism. There were high correlations between FoxO pathway genes and bodyweight, as well as genes related to glycolysis and bodyweight.ConclusionsThis study revealed large transcriptome differences between meat and layer birds. There was significant evidence implicating the FoxO signalling pathway (via cell cycle regulation and altered metabolism) as an active driver of growth variations in chicken. Functional analysis of the FoxO genes is required to understand how they regulate growth and egg production.

Copy Number Variants in Four Italian Turkey Breeds

“…The LIPG gene regulates and hydrolyzes serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) to generate free fatty acids and low-lipid apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 [ 48 ]. The ACAA2 gene is a key enzyme of fatty acid oxidation steps (β-oxidation) and was among the upregulated genes found in meat chicken (top DE genes) with respect to layers and cross (meat x layers) chickens [ 49 ]. In addition, the LMAN1 gene is included within the same CNVR_036, and its possible role in feed efficiency and in daily occupation time in pigs have been reported by [ 50 ].…”

Transcriptome of Chicken Liver Tissues Reveals the Candidate Genes and Pathways Responsible for Adaptation into Two Different Climatic Conditions

“…Pyruvate metabolism pathway plays an important role in the synthesis of glucose from lactate and dihydroxyacetone in chicken liver [33]. Many studies have reported that under any kind of stress, the chicken liver plays a significant role in maintaining homeostasis through glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis pathways [17,34,35]. Glucose is an essential nutrient for any tissue, and the liver provides glucose through gluconeogenesis [36].…”

Screening of differentially expressed immune-related genes from spleen of broilers fed with probiotic Bacillus cereus PAS38 based on suppression subtractive hybridization

“…Previous studies had found that FTH1 was expressed differently in different breeds of chickens. Willson et al found that the expression of FTH1 in laying hen strain was higher than that in broiler strain when they studied the difference in liver transcriptome between broilers and layers [24]. At the same time, Yang et al studied the difference in ovarian transcriptome between low-yielding laying hens and high-yielding laying hens, and found that the expression of FTH1 in high-yielding laying hens was lower than that in low-yielding laying hens [25].…”