2017
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcutaneous Recharge: A Comparison of Numerical Simulation to In Vivo Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the simulation, material parameter definition and boundary condition constraints are required. Under standard atmospheric pressure, the setting parameters and constant values 21,33,3538 are shown in Table 2. The above linear thermal radiation coefficient h r can be calculated by formula (12), 34,39 the external environment temperature is set to T a = 283 K, the physical properties of blood tissue under the skin tissue surface:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Before the simulation, material parameter definition and boundary condition constraints are required. Under standard atmospheric pressure, the setting parameters and constant values 21,33,3538 are shown in Table 2. The above linear thermal radiation coefficient h r can be calculated by formula (12), 34,39 the external environment temperature is set to T a = 283 K, the physical properties of blood tissue under the skin tissue surface:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivity and thickness of other layers are shown in Table 1. 20,33,34 In order to ensure that the contact area of each layer is large enough to get a good convergence result, the length, width, and height are set as 14 mm × 14 mm × 6.2 mm. The size of the carbon fiber heating element embedded in the fabric is: 2a × 2b × H carbon = 0.2 mm × 4 mm × 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Simulation Analysis Based On Ansysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation