2012
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811434262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral Robotic Glossectomy for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea‐Hypopnea Syndrome

Abstract: Robotically assisted partial glossectomy feasibly can be performed without the need for tracheotomy. This technique resulted in greater AHI reduction but increased morbidity compared with the other techniques studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
181
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
181
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The average volume removal (10.29 ml) was lower than the removed tissue in an open approach (25 ml) [2] but higher than in the TORS approach described by Friedman (about 3 ml) [4]. The open approach is more effective at tissue removal and AHI reduction but has not been widely adopted because of pain, length of hospitalization, dysphagia and cosmetic sequelae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average volume removal (10.29 ml) was lower than the removed tissue in an open approach (25 ml) [2] but higher than in the TORS approach described by Friedman (about 3 ml) [4]. The open approach is more effective at tissue removal and AHI reduction but has not been widely adopted because of pain, length of hospitalization, dysphagia and cosmetic sequelae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was devised as a transoral robotic modification of Chabolle's open tongue base reduction and hyoid epiglottopexy [2]. At this time, it is estimated that more than 450 transoral robotic surgeries (TORS) for OSAHS have been performed throughout the world; 201 of them have been reported in the literature (table 1) [1,3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, there have been no multi-institutional studies examining the safety and efficacy of TORS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appliance was activated seven days after osteotomy once each day at the rate of 1mm per day and stabilise for 30-60 days after distraction.  Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for lingual tonsils, epiglottis, and tongue base reduction (Friedman, 2012). Success was 66.7%.…”
Section: Conservatively It Include-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kulak burun boğaz hastalıklarında TORC ilk olarak O'Malley ve Weinstein tarafından uygulanmaya başlanmış, 2009 yılında Amerikan Gıda ve İlaç Birliği TORC'nin ağız, dil, tonsil, farenks ve larenks benign ve malign lezyonlarında kullanımını onaylamıştır. [5] Dil köküne bağlı OUAS'nin cerrahi tedavisinde TORC'nin kullanımı ilk olarak Vicini tarafından tanımlanmıştır. [1] Transoral robotik cerrahinin en önemli avantajı üç boyutlu görüş ve her düz-lemde doku rezeksiyonu imkanı sayılabilmesidir.…”
Section: şEkil 2 Ameliyat Sırası Görüntüunclassified
“…[5] Transoral robotik cerrahisi teknik olarak da ağız boşluğu, hipofarenks, orofarenks, supraglottik bölgelerde hemostazın sağlanması için de oldukça güvenli bir yöntemdir. [4] Fakat transoral robotik cerrahi sonrası koterizasyon gerektiren ameliyat sonrası kanamaların olduğu gösterilmiş olsa da [4] yapı-lan çalışmalarda mikroskopik yaklaşımlara göre TORC'de ameliyat süresinin ve kanama miktarının daha az olduğu bildirilmiştir.…”
Section: şEkil 2 Ameliyat Sırası Görüntüunclassified