1989
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85098-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport models for chemotactic cell populations based on individual cell behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
186
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
10
186
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In by far the majority of applications a constant diffusion coefficient is assumed, yet it is far more likely that this term should depend nonlinearly on the signal concentration and/or the cell density, as can be seen from derivations of Keller-Segel type systems through the various approaches mentioned in the introduction [15,45,80,92,95,96]. An explicit example is given in the formulation of the density-dependent chemotactic sensitivity models above, where a diffusion coefficient of the form D(u) = D (q − uq u ) was derived.…”
Section: (M5) Nonlinear Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In by far the majority of applications a constant diffusion coefficient is assumed, yet it is far more likely that this term should depend nonlinearly on the signal concentration and/or the cell density, as can be seen from derivations of Keller-Segel type systems through the various approaches mentioned in the introduction [15,45,80,92,95,96]. An explicit example is given in the formulation of the density-dependent chemotactic sensitivity models above, where a diffusion coefficient of the form D(u) = D (q − uq u ) was derived.…”
Section: (M5) Nonlinear Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors dating back to Patlak [86] in the 1950s have derived models for chemotaxis based on a more realistic description of individual cell migration (see also [2,76]). Rivero et al [92] (1 + κv) 2 for the case of the flagella bacteria Escherichia coli. Notice also that their derivation resulted in a nonlinear signal-dependent diffusion coefficient.…”
Section: (M6) Saturating Signal Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On fitting the model to the experimental findings of Dahlquist et al, they found that by including expressions for two receptors with different affinities, as part of the chemotactic coefficient, they were able to account for the difference in cell velocities across a range of attractant concentrations. Ford and Cummings (1992) compared each of the models of Alt (1980), Segel (1977) and Rivero et al (1989) and considered the various relationships between each model. They noted that Alt's three-dimensional model can be reduced to one dimension when the attractant gradient is assumed to vary in only one spatial dimension and the run times are distributed according to a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: (T X θ) = β 0 (S(t X) S(t − T X − T Cθ))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with Dtrg mutant show no change in swimming speed with varying concentrations of the non-metabolizable analogue, suggesting that sensing plays a role in the observed variation of swimming speed. These results indicate that variation in swimming speed will play a role in the chemotactic response of the cells when exposed to gradients since the drift velocity is known to be a linear function of the swimming speed (Rivero et al 1989). Thus, the focus of the current study is to investigate the role of swimming speed on the drift velocity of bacteria in gradients of 2Dg and quantify the contribution of swimming speed variation towards the enhancement of net drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%