2013
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2012.692935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trash or treasure: recycling narratives and reducing political polarisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This focus is consistent with research that suggests that framing issues are potentially important for developing broad support for environmental policies (e.g. Lybecker et al 2013). Very few studies examine bill-level variation for this policy field (e.g.…”
Section: Background Literature and Contributionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This focus is consistent with research that suggests that framing issues are potentially important for developing broad support for environmental policies (e.g. Lybecker et al 2013). Very few studies examine bill-level variation for this policy field (e.g.…”
Section: Background Literature and Contributionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…These included the clash between economic rationalism and environmentalism, as well as the way environmental issues were constructed (as a market failure, for example) [52,58,65,79,80,86,[113][114][115]. The framing of discussion and differences in language used between groups were also found to be impediments [48,65,81,83,107,116]. Jabbour et al [48] identified differences in language use by scientists and policy makers as problematic in progressing towards and achieving international environmental goals.…”
Section: Interrelated Structural Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attitudes/ beliefs of the public were found to influence the successful implementation or adoption of sustainable practices [31,51,61,62,69,[77][78][79][80][81]. Social resistance to change was also identified as a significant barrier to policy success [31,80,[82][83][84][85][86].…”
Section: Interrelated Structural Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations