2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0637-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment algorithm and prognostic factors for patients with stage I–III carcinoma of the anal canal: a 20-year multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by recent data from the US National Cancer Database [25], where using a propensity score matched analysis, HPV status only conferred a significant benefit for overall survival in locally advanced cancers. The independent prognostic role for TIL scores shown here is supported by data from a large Belgian study [26] and supports host lymphocyte recognition in meditating outcomes after CRT. Studies comparing the circulating components of the immune system also support the role of lymphocytes (as opposed to an inflammatory phenotype) in mediating outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This finding is supported by recent data from the US National Cancer Database [25], where using a propensity score matched analysis, HPV status only conferred a significant benefit for overall survival in locally advanced cancers. The independent prognostic role for TIL scores shown here is supported by data from a large Belgian study [26] and supports host lymphocyte recognition in meditating outcomes after CRT. Studies comparing the circulating components of the immune system also support the role of lymphocytes (as opposed to an inflammatory phenotype) in mediating outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…PD-L1 expression was considered as positive when membranous immunostaining was detected in ≥1% of cancer cells or inflammatory cells within tumor microenvironment. As previously described, [37][38][39] staining quantification for apoptotic (cleaved caspase 3 + ) cancer cells as well as CD3 + , Foxp3 + , CD68 + , CD206 + and PD-1 + immune cells infiltrating the stroma surrounding tumor cells was performed by computerized counts (QuPath 0.2.0 open source software for digital pathology image analysis). Slides were scanned using 3 dimensional Histech Pannoramic scanner (Sysmex, Villepinte, France).…”
Section: Assessment Of Immunohistochemical Stainingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Liege and the diagnosis of each case was confirmed by experienced histopathologists. IHC analysis was performed using a standard protocol detailed previously [19]. Samples were classified into two groups, namely, EMT-positive vs. EMT-negative, depending on their Vimentin immunoreactivity.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistry and Immunostaining Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were classified into two groups, namely, EMT-positive vs. EMT-negative, depending on their Vimentin immunoreactivity. As previously described [19,20], the IHCs were scored by multiplying two values: intensity (0-3) and extent (0-3), leading to a global score ranging between 0 and 9. Using this latter arbitrary scale, all immunolabelled tissues were evaluated independently by two experienced histopathologists.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistry and Immunostaining Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%