2009
DOI: 10.1080/00981380902831303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment Decision Making and Its Discontents

Abstract: Patient participation in treatment decision making is held as a virtue in clinical contexts, and has much to recommend it. Yet important questions have been raised about the assumptions underlying models of patient participation. Debates have arisen about the significance of medically defined risks and outcomes of treatment; the adequacy and relevance across social groups of the concept of autonomy; and the emphasis on the professional-patient dyad. This article contributes to the debate about treatment decisi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SDM becomes another major concept in an effort to define PCC. As such, it refers to treatment choices by patients that take into account health condition knowledge, experiential knowledge, patient preference, and/or social responsibilities (Muller-Engelmann, Keller, Donner-Banzhoff, & Krones, 2010;Sinding & Wiernikowski, 2009). SDM is implemented while respecting the patient's ultimate goals and implementing a caring attitude (Fine, 2010;Frampton & Guastello, 2010;Jacob, 2010;Robinson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Determine the Defining Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDM becomes another major concept in an effort to define PCC. As such, it refers to treatment choices by patients that take into account health condition knowledge, experiential knowledge, patient preference, and/or social responsibilities (Muller-Engelmann, Keller, Donner-Banzhoff, & Krones, 2010;Sinding & Wiernikowski, 2009). SDM is implemented while respecting the patient's ultimate goals and implementing a caring attitude (Fine, 2010;Frampton & Guastello, 2010;Jacob, 2010;Robinson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Determine the Defining Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2002). Others have focused on prevailing rationalities as an explanation of low levels of participation among old persons (Sinding & Wierrnikowski 2009, Efraimsson et al. 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While client self-determination is at the basis of SDM, social workers must also engage in acquiring resources for patients and influencing policy that limits the treatment options available to them. In a study detailing the decision-making process of older women with cancer, Sinding and Wiernikowski (2009) "highlighted the salience to patients' treatment choices of experiential knowledge, social roles and responsibilities, and the health policy context" (p. 614). Vernberg (1998) argues that the models of medical decision making are too limited using a linear decision making process.…”
Section: The Role For Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%