1996
DOI: 10.1093/jac/37.1.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment failure due to extended spectrum βlactamase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical details of 26 patients previously reported (2,4,8,15,17,18,19,21,22,23,28) are reported in Table 3. When the data for the 10 patients from the international K. pneumoniae bacteremia study were combined with those for the 26 previously reported patients, data for a total of 36 patients were available for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical details of 26 patients previously reported (2,4,8,15,17,18,19,21,22,23,28) are reported in Table 3. When the data for the 10 patients from the international K. pneumoniae bacteremia study were combined with those for the 26 previously reported patients, data for a total of 36 patients were available for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Etest confirmatory strips are convenient but expensive and yield more inconclusive results than CLSI tests due to a more restricted concentration range (11,40). Until proven otherwise, confirmed ESBL-producing isolates should be reported as resistant to all penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam (8) to avoid therapy with antibiotics that may be clinically ineffective (6,20,32,38). This recommendation should apply to all ESBL-producing isolates irrespective of species.…”
Section: Manual Confirmatory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on limited therapeutic outcome data (3,31), pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data (3), and the concept that the lower the cephalosporin MIC the greater the likelihood of successful therapy (3,19,31). At variance with this approach, there are reports of therapeutic failures with cefepime associated with MICs of Յ2 g/ml (31) and 4 g/ml in a pediatric patient (3) and with a cefotaxime MIC of 0.75 g/ml (20). There is also the concern that instead of the simplicity of cephalosporin and aztreonam susceptibility results being automatically changed to resistant for positive isolates, labs face the impossible task of having to overcome the inherent variability of testing ESBL-labile drugs to provide precise and accurate results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly revealing studies performed in the United States and Europe by Tenover et al, and Livermore et al, respectively, reported that errors in the detection of ESBL mediated resistance are frequently encountered with both automated and disk diffusion methods [8,24]. It might be due to the variable affinity of enzymes for different substrates and inoculums effect [26]. It is also documented that ESBL-producing organism with third-generation cephalosporins may result in clinical failure if the infection is outside the urinary tract [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%