2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of acidic mine drainage in an adsorption process using calcium silicate modified with Fe(III)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have been conducted on the adsorption properties of silicates towards heavy metal ions, With an emphasis on quantifying adsorption performance through the analysis of various influencing factors such as time, initial concentration, pH, etc to explain the adsorption processes. Recently, Fe(III) modified calcium silicate hydrates have investigated their properties and application in removing As(V), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) from acidic mine drainage [115]. With a pH range of 2-4, an equilibration time of 120 min, Fe(III)-calcium silicate hydrates (CSHs) achieved removal efficiencies of 99.94% for Cu(II), 99.98% for Cd(II), 99.99% for Zn(II), with the maximum arsenic loading capacity approaching 55 mg g −1 .…”
Section: Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been conducted on the adsorption properties of silicates towards heavy metal ions, With an emphasis on quantifying adsorption performance through the analysis of various influencing factors such as time, initial concentration, pH, etc to explain the adsorption processes. Recently, Fe(III) modified calcium silicate hydrates have investigated their properties and application in removing As(V), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) from acidic mine drainage [115]. With a pH range of 2-4, an equilibration time of 120 min, Fe(III)-calcium silicate hydrates (CSHs) achieved removal efficiencies of 99.94% for Cu(II), 99.98% for Cd(II), 99.99% for Zn(II), with the maximum arsenic loading capacity approaching 55 mg g −1 .…”
Section: Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that the presence of iron in the nanosorbent had a major role in the removal of As through formation of water insoluble and stable double iron and calcium arsenate salts (Briso et al 2018). In another study, Barrera et al (2017) reported nanostructured calcium silicate hydrate, unmodified or modified with Fe (III), for removal of heavy metals such as Cd (II), Cu (II) and Zn (II) from acidic aqueous solutions. Some of the studied magnetic nanosorbents are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Magnetic Sorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As (V) can be easily eliminated by adsorption technology using adsorbents, but it is difficult to remove As (III) by adsorption processes, and therefore, As (III) requires oxidation before adsorption (Liu et al, 2019, Mohan and Pittman, 2007, Otgonjargal et al, 2012, Suvokhiaw et al, 2016. There are many methods of removing As (V); among them, the adsorption method is regarded as high efficiency, relatively costeffective technology, and minimum generation of toxic sludge for water treatment (Barrera et al, 2017, Liu et al, 2019, Núñez-Gómez et al, 2019, Otgonjargal et al, 2012, Suvokhiaw et al, 2016, Zhou et al, 2018. Various adsorbents have been developed in previous studies, such as clay minerals, activated alumina, activated carbon, and ion exchange resin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%