2011
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease, other chronic diseases and health-related behaviors in an adult Korean population: data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES)

Abstract: The CKD prevalence was decreased from 2005 to 2007. Since increased diabetes and improved diabetic control neutralized their impact on CKD, improved BP was the fundamental reason for the decrease. Various health-related behaviors may have indirectly affected the decrease of CKD through their effect in controlling BP and diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the risk of CKD is higher in women than men (OR, 1.354; p < 0.001), and the difference seems to be caused by the susceptibility to albuminuria (OR, 1.416; p < 0.001) rather than decreased GFR (OR, 1.057; p = 0.683). When GFR was estimated using the MDRD Study equation, the increased risks of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in women were observed in previous studies: OR, 3.16 ( p < 0.001) using KNHANES III and IV-1 [12]; frequencies of 3.4%, 9.7%, 10.2%, and 4.6% in women, and 1.0%, 5.4%, 3.1%, and 2.6% were seen in men through KNHANES I-IV [13]. There seemed to be no difference in ACR according to gender in the previous study (10.1% and 10.3% in women and men, respectively) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the risk of CKD is higher in women than men (OR, 1.354; p < 0.001), and the difference seems to be caused by the susceptibility to albuminuria (OR, 1.416; p < 0.001) rather than decreased GFR (OR, 1.057; p = 0.683). When GFR was estimated using the MDRD Study equation, the increased risks of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in women were observed in previous studies: OR, 3.16 ( p < 0.001) using KNHANES III and IV-1 [12]; frequencies of 3.4%, 9.7%, 10.2%, and 4.6% in women, and 1.0%, 5.4%, 3.1%, and 2.6% were seen in men through KNHANES I-IV [13]. There seemed to be no difference in ACR according to gender in the previous study (10.1% and 10.3% in women and men, respectively) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The previously reported CKD prevalence calculated from the MDRD Study equation together with ACR was 13.7% in urban Korean volunteers aged ≥ 35 [11]. The CKD prevalence calculated from the MDRD Study equation alone was 8.8% in 2005 and 7.2% in 2007 in Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) subjects aged ≥ 20 [12]; the prevalence calculated using the MDRD Study equation with the dipstick proteinuria method has tended to decrease since 2001 in men and since 2005 in women among KNHANES I to IV (1998 to 2009) subjects aged ≥ 20 [13]. Since there are no reports on CKD prevalence using the CKD-EPI equations to estimate GFR and ACR to measure albuminuria for Koreans, a new analysis of CKD prevalence is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the present study conducted in Korea, the prevalence of CKD in subjects with diabetes was 8.6%, lower than in Western populations as well as other East Asian populations [29]. In the United States, the prevalence of CKD increased from 14.9% in NHANES 1988-1994 to 17.7% in NHANES 2005-2008 in patients with diabetes [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The CKD prevalence in Korean adults was 7.2% in 2007 according to the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2). In clinical trials that have examined whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) slow CKD progression, both treatments were found to be effective in terms of serum creatinine (SCr) preservation, progression to ESRD, or death (3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%