Trends in Use and Adverse Outcomes Associated with Transvenous Lead Removal in the United States

Abstract

Background— Transvenous lead removal (TLR) has made significant progress with respect to innovation, efficacy, and safety. However, limited data exist regarding trends in use and adverse outcomes outside the centers of considerable experience for TLR. The aim of our study was to examine use patterns, frequency of adverse events, and influence of hospital volume on complications. Methods and Results— Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified 91 890 TLR procedures. We investigated common complications including pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with TLR, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. We specifically assessed in-hospital death (2.2%), hemorrhage requiring transfusion (2.6%), vascular complications (2.0%), pericardial complications (1.4%), open heart surgery (0.2%), and postoperative respiratory failure (2.4%). Independent predictors of complications were female sex and device infections. Hospital volume was not independently associated with higher complications. There was a significant rise in overall complication rates over the study period. Conclusions— The overall complication rate in patients undergoing TLR was higher than previously reported. Female sex and device infections are associated with higher complications. Hospital volume was not associated with higher complication rates. The number of adverse events in the literature likely underestimates the actual number of complications associated with TLR.

Risk Factors and Temporal Trends of Complications Associated With Transvenous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Leads

“…The incremental financial burden associated with reintervention in our study was $68 000 to treat an infection and $36 000 to treat a mechanical failure, and the average costs for the year before and the year after a complication were elevated if a patient had an infection. This is in consonance with other studies that suggest that the healthcare expenditure associated with infections and reinterventions could be astronomical 22, 23, 24…”

Lead Extraction: The Importance of Preparation and Remaining Opportunities

“…3 Randomized prospective trials in this field are lacking. 3 Randomized prospective trials in this field are lacking.…”

“…9 Hybrid procedures designed to avoid sternotomy and the consequent morbidity have been reported. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The SVC-RA junction remains the site most prone to injury. These have included novel methods like retrograde laser use via right atriotomy 8 and direct visualization of the SVC-RA junction by a limited local thoracotomy or thoracoscopy.…”

Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extractions for noninfectious superfluous leads in a Japanese population: A single‐center experience

“…According to the data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry of the United States of America, major complications occurred in 2.3% among a total of 11 304 TLE procedures and urgent cardiac surgeries were required in 16% of those . Previous reports have demonstrated that a higher number of extracted leads are associated with a higher risk of complications and a long‐term mortality . In the latest ESC‐EHRA European Lead Extraction registry, more than three lead extractions are an independent predictor of a cardiac avulsion or tear with a tamponade .…”