Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the most extensively studied topics with respect to the triple, quadruple and quintuple helix models developed to explain these links. The review also focusses on ascertaining future trends within this field. Design/methodology/approach Relevant documents obtained from a search in the Institute for Scientific Information’s Web of Science were submitted to bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software. Findings The results of this systematic review illustrate that, despite growing concern about society and the environment, issues related to the three helixes of universities, industries and governments continue to be the most often studied. However, an additional focus on research on the quadruple and quintuple helix models has emerged in the more specialised literature. An analysis of co-citations also identified four clusters of research such as, innovation and knowledge policies; entrepreneurial universities; business innovation strategy; and triple helix stakeholders in innovation, knowledge and regional development. Originality/value Some policies are needed. Polices that undergo the mapping of the universities’ specialisations, the industry/society necessities and financial measures could foster the relations between all the stakeholders.

Digital social entrepreneurship: the N-Helix response to stakeholders’ COVID-19 needs

“…Third, collaboration among diverse social and economic agents ( N-Helix) facilitates the emergence of global knowledge-intensive initiatives (Del Giudice et al, 2017 ). These environments facilitate integrated collaborations, co-created shared values, cultivated innovation eco-systems, unleashed exponential technologies, and extraordinarily rapid adoptions (Galvao et al, 2019 ).…”

“…Individuals will better value service if they do not have to pay for it; in this sense, DSE will positively affect stakeholder satisfaction (H3b). In this vein, DSE will increase users’ satisfaction since N-Helix initiatives can provide better quality resources and disseminate high-level innovation to stakeholders (Bonaccorsi & Piccaluga, 1994 ; Galvao et al, 2019 ). Therefore, we anticipate a positive effect of the N-Helix collaboration on stakeholder satisfaction through DSE (H3c).…”

Sustainable Growth Approaches: Quadruple Helix Approach for Turning Brașov into a Startup City

“…Constantly changing markets due to globalization have meant that knowledge and innovation have become key factors in the sustainable development of any economy, and industries have become increasingly dependent on academic research to generate marketable innovations and economic growth [7,8]. This new need for innovation has given rise to the triple helix theory.…”

“…This new need for innovation has given rise to the triple helix theory. This model is associated with the concept of academic entrepreneurship, because seeks to define the new entrepreneurial dimension of universities, in which they and other knowledge-producing organizations play a strong role [7,9]. This theory was further developed to the quadruple helix, which involves a collaboration between governance, academia, industry, and citizens.…”

Treatment innovation for patients: a collaborative network in the Benelux and an inside view of 20 years of Galapagos

“…In recent years, a transition to large-scale collaborations has been observed across the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries leading to centres such as the collaboration between Imec (research in nano and digital technology) and Janssen Pharmaceutica in the Benelux [6]. Collaborations with more than two stakeholders often fall within the 'triple helix' model comprising academia, industry and government [7].…”