2009
DOI: 10.1097/maj.0b013e31819c7320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple or Quadruple Tetracycline-Based Therapies Versus Standard Triple Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After detailed review of selected articles, 12 RCTs [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] with 2,753 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the meta-analysis (fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After detailed review of selected articles, 12 RCTs [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] with 2,753 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the meta-analysis (fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pooled analysis of anti-H. pylori treatment regimens, clarithromycin based triple regimens with 76%-85% eradication rate have been considered the most effective anti-H. pylori therapeutic strategies (7,18,25 In more recent studies, bismuth based quadruple therapy has been best in regards to eradication rate, probably due to the emergence of macrolid resistant strains (25). Eradication rate in another study has been as low as 35.6% (26). The most acceptable duration has been determined to be between ten and fourteen days (25,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of H. pylori eradication strategies, the appropriate length of treatment and the cost effectiveness, all appear controversial [13][14][15][16]. Further reports in literature have devaluated the triple therapy and suggested a quadruple one [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%