2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.85.034337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triple shape coexistence and shape evolution in theN=58Sr and Zr isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This transition is fairly smooth, implying a certain mixing between the two configurations. Such prolate-oblate mixing has been considered previously in 96 Sr and 98 Zr in complex excited VAMPIR calculations [74]. The maximum prolate deformations reached in the region are fully consistent with the calculations presented in Figure 9 and correspond to Q ∼ 4 eb.…”
Section: Configsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This transition is fairly smooth, implying a certain mixing between the two configurations. Such prolate-oblate mixing has been considered previously in 96 Sr and 98 Zr in complex excited VAMPIR calculations [74]. The maximum prolate deformations reached in the region are fully consistent with the calculations presented in Figure 9 and correspond to Q ∼ 4 eb.…”
Section: Configsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These calculations were employed for the description of the shape coexistence phenomena in A ≈ 100 [44] including Gamow-Teller strength distributions [45]. The results for the strength obtained using the Bonn-A and Bonn-CD interactions taken from [19] are shown in Table II already compared in [19] with the B(GT) distribution obtained from the high-resolution study of Piqueras et al [31] with a remarkably good agreement.…”
Section: Comparison With Predictions From Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of 96 Sr, our results can be further compared to those obtained using the complex excited VAMPIR approach with a realistic effective interaction based on the Bonn A potential in a large model space [40]. These calculations predict a B(E2,2…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the predictions of these two fundamentally different models are remarkably consistent and call for a systematic comparison along isotopic chains between the two models. A Table IX, and in addition those for J = 0 are compared to available experimental data and excited VAMPIR [40] and 5DCH (PC-PK1) [54] predictions in Tables VII and VIII. In 96 Sr, a large transition strength is predicted between the 0 + 2 state and the ground state by both our calculation and the VAMPIR approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation