Troy in clearer perspective

Abstract

Was late Troy VI a large Anatolian palatial city, a hub for trade, a commercial metropolis or even the centre of a Bronze Age federation of cities (hanse), as the present excavator of Hisarlik, M. Korfmann, has claimed in numerous publications? Several German archaeologists and historians have maintained the opposite and declared Korfmann's view of Troy as unfounded and a fiction. In a recent article in Anatolian Studies (2002: 75–109) D.F. Easton, J.D. Hawkins, and A.G. and E.S. Sherratt state that they share the opinion of the excavator. In reality, they do not defend the above mentioned views, but offer a more restrained description of the role of Troy VI in the Late Bronze Age. Their arguments, though, can be shown to be untenable due to insufficient evidence. Thus, a thorough criticism of Korfmann's statements remains fully justified.

Arqueología Clásica Y Aprendizaje Autónomo en El Aula Universitaria De Grado. Classical Archaeology and Autonomous Learning in the Undergraduate Classroom

“…75-109. -En contra: Hertel, D.;Kolb, F. (2003): "Troy in clearer perspective", Anatolian Studies, 53, pp. 71-88.…”