2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijlsm.2019.101164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truck scheduling problems in the cross docking network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A numerous surveys (Gu et al, 2007;Maknoon and Baptiste, 2009;Boysen and Fliedner, 2010;Van Belle et al, 2012;Buijs et al, 2014;Guastaroba et al, 2016;Haddad et al, 2018;Schiffer et al, 2019;Cortes and Suzuki, 2020;Esmizadeh and Mellat Parast, 2021) devoted to vehicle routing problems with cross-docking (VRPCD), and articles to study operations management in TDAS (Cohen and Keren, 2009;Darestani and Tahaei, 2015;Ferretti et al, 2018;Goodarzi et al, 2020;Haial et al, 2020;Parker et al, 2016) are examples of this trend. Generally, the scheduling goals include but not limited to the minimisation of tardiness of outbound trucks, earliness of inbound trucks, makespan, and waiting time for trucks to be processed (Rijal et al, 2019;Wisittipanich et al, 2019;Paul and Paul, 2020). This section provides a detailed review is the TDAS under the CDAP studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A numerous surveys (Gu et al, 2007;Maknoon and Baptiste, 2009;Boysen and Fliedner, 2010;Van Belle et al, 2012;Buijs et al, 2014;Guastaroba et al, 2016;Haddad et al, 2018;Schiffer et al, 2019;Cortes and Suzuki, 2020;Esmizadeh and Mellat Parast, 2021) devoted to vehicle routing problems with cross-docking (VRPCD), and articles to study operations management in TDAS (Cohen and Keren, 2009;Darestani and Tahaei, 2015;Ferretti et al, 2018;Goodarzi et al, 2020;Haial et al, 2020;Parker et al, 2016) are examples of this trend. Generally, the scheduling goals include but not limited to the minimisation of tardiness of outbound trucks, earliness of inbound trucks, makespan, and waiting time for trucks to be processed (Rijal et al, 2019;Wisittipanich et al, 2019;Paul and Paul, 2020). This section provides a detailed review is the TDAS under the CDAP studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One constraint set which is missing from the model is the scheduling constraint for vehicle arrivals and departure. For forklift utilisation and minimisation of the number of forklifts inside the terminal, we need to assume a truck schedule (Wisittipanich et al, 2019;Paul and Paul, 2020). Without a constraint to enforce this condition, the model's solution can lack a realistic approach.…”
Section: Scheduling Constraint For Trucksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also highlighted the importance of synchronization in cross-docking networks and described two real-life illustrative problems. Wisittipanich et al (2019) presented a MIP model of truck scheduling problem in the cross-docking network comprised of multiple cross-dock and emphasized on the importance of synchronisation within this network. They sought to find the optimal truck schedule and product transshipment aiming at minimizing the makespan.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guemri et al [20] researched the cross-docking assignment problem (CDAP), in which the goal is to assign the inbound/outbound trucks to receiving/shipping dock doors to minimize the material 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering handling cost with respecting the capacity and assignment constraints. Wisittipanich et al [21] paid attention to the integration problem between multiple cross-dockings. ey addressed the novel problem in a cross-docking network and synchronized all inbound/outbound trucks throughout the network to minimize total operational time.…”
Section: Truck Scheduling In a Cross-docking Center Boysen Andmentioning
confidence: 99%