2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00044-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRUS and Biopsy: Practical Aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), another important potential difference between the probes is their ability to hit a specific prostatic site in T1c cases when a biopsy template is used. It was previously reported that the prostate apex may be difficult to sample with the SF probe, while a greater sampling of tissue from the peripheral zone is possible with an EF probe [5]. However, the ability to sample a specific area is related more to the ability of the operator than to the mechanical characteristics of the probe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), another important potential difference between the probes is their ability to hit a specific prostatic site in T1c cases when a biopsy template is used. It was previously reported that the prostate apex may be difficult to sample with the SF probe, while a greater sampling of tissue from the peripheral zone is possible with an EF probe [5]. However, the ability to sample a specific area is related more to the ability of the operator than to the mechanical characteristics of the probe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%